Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2930

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2930

► remove from comparison Intel N2930

The Intel Celeron N2930 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.83 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2930 supports Quick Sync as well as Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2930 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2930 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of 313 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact (and sometimes even passively cooled) subnotebooks and tablets.

ModelIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2930
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz1830 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP7.5 Watt7.5 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2930
SocketFCBGA1170
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 854 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Speedstep

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
min: 1.39     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.59 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (1%)
min: 0.4     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.41 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 Points (8%)
min: 1120     avg: 1131     median: 1131.5 (10%)     max: 1141 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 Points (4%)
min: 3687     avg: 3865     median: 3880 (5%)     max: 4013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (4%)
min: 5663     avg: 5709     median: 5708.5 (5%)     max: 5754 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (7%)
min: 1525     avg: 1567     median: 1566.5 (10%)     max: 1608 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2930 +
852 s (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2930 +
27.3 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2930 +
1181 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2930 +
9.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2930 +
47 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2930 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2930 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1612 Points (3%)
2214 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
38.7 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61 s (3%)
84.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
1814 s (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 1594     avg: 1666     median: 1679 (6%)     max: 1693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
min: 4049     avg: 14857     median: 17776 (11%)     max: 18182 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
min: 331     avg: 1258     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1532 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2910 +
1566 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 2621     avg: 2686     median: 2703 (5%)     max: 2728 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 819     avg: 836     median: 839 (16%)     max: 842 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2001 Points (16%)
2493 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1743 Points (16%)
2275 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2189 Points (4%)
2992 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2544 Points (5%)
3477 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2205 Points (6%)
2968 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 4664     avg: 9867     median: 7469.5 (9%)     max: 19863 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 378.6     avg: 828     median: 423.3 (5%)     max: 2304 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
min: 1238     avg: 4231     median: 4176.5 (4%)     max: 7334 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 N2930 +
41680 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 N2930 +
2046 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2930 → 128% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 26. 17:02:39

#0 checking url part for id 4576 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5686 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 4576 +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 got single benchmarks 4576 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 5686 +0s ... 0.02s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#28 got single benchmarks 5686 +0.014s ... 0.035s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.042s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.052s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#132 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.058s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.022s ... 0.081s

#134 return log +0.004s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)