Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N2920

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove from comparison Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove from comparison Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2920
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Celeron N29201860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1460 MHz2 / 2
1580 - 2160 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz
112 KB224 KB
1 MB2 MB
2 / 24 / 4
4.3 7.5
22 22
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, SpeedstepHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless Display
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron N2807Intel Celeron N2920

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
65 Points (1%)
min: 116     avg: 119     median: 118.5 (3%)     max: 121 Points
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
35 Points (15%)
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (14%)     max: 33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (3%)     max: 1.47 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.3 Points (10%)
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (15%)     max: 0.38 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
986 Points (10%)
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (11%)     max: 1049 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2093 Points (4%)
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (6%)     max: 3626 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
3047 Points (4%)
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (6%)     max: 5244 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
1584 Points (15%)
1453 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
1763 seconds (21%)
962 seconds (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
57.4 seconds (12%)
32 seconds (6%)
WinRAR - Result
408 KB/s (4%)
1728 KB/s (18%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
3.2 fps (2%)
8.4 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
17 fps (6%)
42.1 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 N2920 +
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (12%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
38.8 Seconds (8%)
43.7 Seconds (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
84.7 Seconds (4%)
95 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
1806 Seconds (8%)
2035 Seconds (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
1 N2920 +
3606 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
976 points (4%)
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (7%)     max: 1679 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
6368 Points (4%)
15979 Points (10%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
548 Points (1%)
1355 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 N2920 +
1952 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 N2807 +
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 N2807 +
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 N2807 +
1391 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 N2807 +
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 N2807 +
1658 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
1 N2807 +
1089 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
1 N2807 +
688 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 191% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)