Intel Atom N2600 vs Intel Atom N2850

Intel Atom N2600

► remove

The Intel Atom N2600 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in December 2011 after some troubles with the graphics drivers (according to rumors). 

The N2600 features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 400MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3600 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core is still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2600 is comparable to an older Atom N570.

The integrated 64Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 2 GB RAM.

Intel Atom N2850

► remove

The Intel Atom N2850 is a dual core entry level processor for netbooks and tablets. It was officially announced in January 2012 and is produced in 32nm.

It features a PowerVR SGX545 based graphics card (at 640MHz) named Graphics Media Accelerator 3650 and a video decoding engine for MPEG4 Part2, VC-1, WMV9, and H.264. Furthermore, the chip now also supports DisplayPort 1.1 and HDMI 1.3a outputs.

The processor core should be still similar to the old Atom processors. Therefore the performance of the N2850 should be faster than an older Atom D525.

The integrated 64 Bit Single-Channel DDR3-800/1067 memory controller supports two SODIMMS and a maximum of 4 GB RAM.

Intel Atom N2600Intel Atom N2850
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Cedarview-MCedarview-M
: Atom Cedarview-M
Intel Atom N28502000 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2800 compare1860 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2650 compare1733 MHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N26001600 MHz2 / 4
» Intel Atom N28502000 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2800 compare1860 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N2650 compare1733 MHz2 / 4
Intel Atom N26001600 MHz2 / 4
1600 MHz2000 MHz
1 MB1 MB
2 / 42 / 4
3.5 6,6
32 32
FCBGA559
GMA 3600 (400MHz), Single Channel Memory Controller (2GB DDR3)
iGPUIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)
$47 U.S.
Intel Atom N2600

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 531     avg: 540     median: 541 (6%)     max: 547
min: 531     avg: 539.7     median: 541 (6%)     max: 547
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1434     avg: 1513     median: 1527.5 (3%)     max: 1562
min: 1434     avg: 1512.8     median: 1527.5 (3%)     max: 1562
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
2064 s (24%)
2064 s (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
66 s (13%)
66 s (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
9.9 fps (6%)
9.9 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
9.8 fps (3%)
9.8 fps (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (5%)     max: 829 Points
min: 795     avg: 812     median: 812 (5%)     max: 829 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
92 s (20%)
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
204 s (9%)
204 s (9%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
4541 s (20%)
4541 s (20%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
8139 MIPS (4%)
8139 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
6745 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
1631 Points (10%)
1631 Points (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.3 Points (42%)
3.3 Points (42%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
-1 Points (-0%)
-1 Points (-0%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
-1 Points (-0%)
-1 Points (-0%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2600 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom N2850 → 100% n=14

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)