ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP vs ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

► remove

The ATI Mobilty Radeon 7000 IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based notebooks. It supports dual display and Powerplay. The integrated graphics core is based on the Mobility Radeon M6 (R100) core. Compared to the IGP 320M and 340M, the 7000 IGP is similar but classified a bit faster (performance class).

ATI Radeon IGP 340M

► remove

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the similar IGP 320M (Athlon XP version, with a bit different clock speed) with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

 

ATI Radeon IGP 320M

► remove ATI Radeon IGP 320M

The ATI Radeon IGP 320M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Mobile Athlon XP based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the IGP 320M with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is the Intel Pentium 4-M version of the chipset.

ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGPATI Radeon IGP 340MATI Radeon IGP 320M
ManufacturerATIATIATI
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 180 MHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 160 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 180 MHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 160 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 400 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 300 MHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 180 MHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 160 MHz
CodenameR100
0 / 2 0 / 2 0 / 2
yesyesyes
DirectXDirectX 7DirectX 7DirectX 7
FeaturesHyperZ, FSAA, 32Bit ZBuffer
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
Introduced01.03.2003 05.10.2002 05.10.2002
Manufacturerhttp://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...
Core180 MHz160 MHz

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 1450     avg: 1625     median: 1625 (2%)     max: 1800 Points
1235 Points (1%)
1537 Points (2%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 70     avg: 82.5     median: 82 (0%)     max: 95 Points
55.1 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP → 100%

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 340M → 72%

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 320M → 95%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)