Medion E1311
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Medion E1311
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionMedion's new E1311 netbook rises above the crowd with its 11.6in higher resolution screen and AMD processors. This is a most promising package offered by Medion, distinguished by a slightly larger screen of higher resolution than most netbooks. And with its AMD processor and ATI graphics processor, its performance was just ahead of the Intel chips we usually see in netbooks. Unfortunately power consumption was also higher; so despite the reasonably sized battery pack, it could only run for around three hours off the mains. But the biggest letdown was the mirror-like screen finish, which meant constantly fighting with reflections just to see the desktop.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 80% workmanship: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2009
Rating: Total score: 58% price: 70% performance: 100% features: 98% mobility: 23% ergonomy: 35%
Source: Les Numeriques
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/07/2009
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 70% mobility: 60% ergonomy: 60%
Comment
ATI Radeon Xpress X1270: Built in RS690T chipset and is based on an X700 graphics core (with less pipelines). It features no dedicated graphics memory but Vista Aero support.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
AMD Mobile Sempron: 2800+ to 3000+ mobile Athlon 64 with reduced level 2 Cache; The rating is not comparable with Athlon 64 Rating. A 3000+ Athlon 64 is faster than a 3000+ Sempron. There is no 64 bit support.
Especially: Sempron 2100+, socket S1, 9 Watt TDP, 1 GHz
210U: For embedded systems intenden single core processor. Due to a very small level 2 cache, the performance is limited and only a bit above Atom 1.8 GHz processors.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

