MSI Megabook S262
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 11 reviews)
Reviews for the MSI Megabook S262
Source: Star Techcentral
Archive.org versionThis My10s notebook surprised me – it is a very well built, small and good-looking notebook. At the price of RM3,899 the My10s is a noteworthy choice, especially considering that the specifications aren’t bad at all. Other than the hiccup with the keyboard design and pretty short battery life, the notebook performed very well overall. Pros: Nice design; compact; nice screen. Cons: short battery life; non-standard keyboard layout.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
Preis/Leistung gut, Display gut, Verarbeitung sehr gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2006
Rating: price: 85% display: 85% workmanship: 95%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/31/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% features: 50% display: 50% mobility: 40% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: TV Movie Multimedia
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 85%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 95% performance: 59% features: 84% display: 93% mobility: 72% ergonomy: 71%
Source: Digital Living
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/15/2006
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 85% performance: 90% features: 87% mobility: 67% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 71%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 83% performance: 85% features: 85% display: 85%
Source: PC Games Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2006
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 65% workmanship: 50%
Source: PC Go
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2006
Rating: Total score: 68% mobility: 85%
Source: c't
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/29/2006
Rating: performance: 85% display: 80% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/17/2006
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 70% display: 82% mobility: 78% workmanship: 89% ergonomy: 87% emissions: 78%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2400: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
