Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Turion II Neo K685 vs AMD Turion II Neo K625

AMD Turion II Neo K685

► remove from comparison

The AMD Turion II Neo Dual-Core K685 is a laptop processor for small and light subnotebooks. It is based on the Champlain core (K10 architecture) and should be similar to the desktop Athlon II line. The K685 offers an integrated DDR3 memory controller and a 1600 MHz 16 Bit HyperTransport 3.0 (HT3200) link.

AMD Turion II Neo K625

► remove from comparison

The AMD Turion II Neo K625 is a laptop processor for small and thin subnotebooks. It is part of the Nile platform in conjunction with the AMD M880G chipset (Radeon HD 4225 on board graphics). Compared to the slower Athlon II and V Series CPUs, the Turion II offers a 128 Bit FPU and 1.6 GHz HyperTransport Link (compared to 64 Bit and 1 GHz). The integrated memory controller supports DDR3-1066 memory.

The performance of the CPU is compareable with 1.3-1.4 GHz Core 2 Duo processors (e.g., SU7300, SU9400). The power consumption of a Nile platform laptop (M301z) was higher than compareable SU based Intel systems. Still, the PCMark Vantage results were better.

ModelAMD Turion II Neo K685AMD Turion II Neo K625
CodenameGenevaGeneva
SeriesAMD Turion II NeoAMD Turion II Neo
Series: Turion II Neo Geneva
AMD Turion II Neo K685 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K665 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K645 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K6251.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K6851.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K665 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K645 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Turion II Neo K625 « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 MHz1500 MHz
FSB32003200
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1g4S1
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
K685 +
1 Points (1%)
0.9 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
K685 +
1424 Points (9%)
1241 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
K685 +
3083 Points (2%)
2541 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
K685 +
3839 Points (2%)
3227 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
K685 +
1765 Points (2%)
1561 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
K685 +
1410 s (17%)
1657 s (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
K685 +
42 s (8%)
53.3 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
K685 +
1451 Points (3%)
1224 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
K685 +
42 s (9%)
50 s (11%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
K685 +
115 s (5%)
101%
K625 +
114 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
K685 +
2517 s (11%)
2662 s (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 K625 +
3478 Points (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
K685 +
4.8 Points (62%)
4.3 Points (55%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 K625 +
2459 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II Neo K685 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II Neo K625 → 87% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 10. 19:37:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1539 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 949 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733855825s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:18:26 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1539 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 1539 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 949 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 949 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.021s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.023s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)