Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS

► remove from comparison

The GeForce 9500M GS is a middle class graphics card from the GeForce 9000M series and the successor of the  8600M GT GPU. Benchmarks show an average 10% increase of frame rates in all games because of internal optimizations (compared to a 8600M GT with the same GPU and memory clock). According to Nvidia the card should also have a lower current consumption.

The card offers full DirectX 10 hardware acceleration, but is not fast enough to render DirectX 10 effects of demanding games, like Crysis, fluently.

The particularity of this video card are the "Unified Shader". Pixel- and vertex-shaders do not exist any more but 32 of the so called stream processors do the graphic work (which up to now pixel- and vertex shaders did).

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE (sometimes also called only 9500M or 9500M GM) is a combination of the Nvidia GeForce 9400M (G) chipset and a dedicated NB9M entry level graphics card (GeForce 9200M GS or 9300M GS) in GeForceBoost mode.

HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost uses the integrated graphics core of the 9400M G and the dedicated of the NB9M (9300M GS or 9200M GS) in SLI mode to achieve better frame rates.

The performance of the 9500M GE graphic solution depends on the SLI support of the game and the type of dediacted NB9M graphics card (clock rates and memory). Dell for example claims to reach 3300 points in 3DMark06 with a 9300M GS with 256MB GDDR3 RAM (in GeForceBoost mode). This would be as fast as slow GeForce 8600M GT cards. Still the performance in actual games may be much slower.

Furthermore, the 9500M may suffer from micro stuttering (stuttering in playable regions of 30 fps) in GeforceBoost because of different frame times.

The gaming performance of the solution should be sufficient for DirectX 9 games in medium detail settings. Demanding DirectX 10 games, like Crysis will only run in low detail settings.

The power consumption of the 9500M GE depends on the Hybid SLI setting and can reach up to 25 Watt TDP for the combination (including the chipset).

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GSNVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
GeForce 9500M Series
GeForce 9500M GS 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 9500M G compare 16 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9500M GE 24 64 Bit
GeForce 9500M GS 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 9500M G compare 16 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9500M GE 24 64 Bit
CodenameNB9P-GE1MCP79Mx + NB9M
ArchitectureG8x
Pipelines32 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed475 MHz
Shader Speed950 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2 / GDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.0, Shader 4.0
Transistors289 Million
technology80 nm65 nm
FeaturesShader mit 950 MHz getaktet
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.02.2008 09.01.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Power Consumption25 Watt

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
863 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
690 Points (0%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 16781     avg: 21146     median: 20861 (22%)     max: 25834 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 6580     avg: 10192     median: 10763 (6%)     max: 11485 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 6236     avg: 6669     median: 6782 (7%)     max: 7066 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
3DMark 06
min: 3655     avg: 3663     median: 3662.5 (5%)     max: 3670 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
3DMark 06
min: 3225     avg: 3679     median: 3705.5 (5%)     max: 4078 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
3DMark 06
3352 Points (4%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
min: 5     avg: 5.2     median: 5.3 (78%)     max: 5.3 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
min: 4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.8 (71%)     max: 4.8 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2725     avg: 3090     median: 3161 (2%)     max: 3383 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
48.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
18.6  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
10.3  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
42 42.9 ~ 42 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
18.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
9.2  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
27 30 ~ 29 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
14 16 ~ 15 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
52 72 239 393 ~ 189 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
29 69 107 121 ~ 82 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
27 31 34 37 ~ 32 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
143 159.9 160.6 ~ 155 fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
140 159.9 163.5 ~ 154 fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
118 127.9 132.1 ~ 126 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
78 84.7 87.6 ~ 83 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M GS:
454.6 501 ~ 478 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GS → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GSlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark48.918.610.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark4218.19.2
World in Conflict - Benchmark2915
F.E.A.R.1898232
Doom 315515412683
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo478
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

2
3

1
1
3
1

2


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 15:47:22

#0 checking url part for id 683 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1082 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.088s ... 0.089s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.089s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.089s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 683 +0.028s ... 0.117s

#8 got single benchmarks 683 +0.02s ... 0.137s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1082 +0.002s ... 0.139s

#10 got single benchmarks 1082 +0.007s ... 0.146s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.146s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.169s ... 0.315s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.315s

#14 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.321s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.321s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.324s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.34s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.34s

#19 return log +0.052s ... 0.392s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)