Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

The Nvidia GeForce 9400M G is an integrated (onboard) graphics card for laptops without dedicated graphics memory. The card was introduced in October 2008 in conjunction with the new Apple MacBook, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air products (called only 9400M). At the time of announcement it was the fastest mGPU (motherboard GPU) on the market.

The 9400M G graphics core is used in the MCP79 laptop chipset and in the ION platform for netbooks (which is essentially the same). The ION LE uses the same graphics core, but the DirectX support is limited to 9 (instead of 10). The clock rates of all thre platforms is identical.

The performance of the 9400M G is comparable to current entry level GPUs with dedicated graphics memory (like the GeForce 9300M GS).Therefore, the graphics adapater is able to display older games (like Doom3) in high details fluently and new (not too demanding games) in low details fluently. Warhammer Online should for example run on the 2.4 GHz MacBook fluently. Compared to the predecessor in the MacBook, the Intel GMA X3100, the GeForce 9400M should perform 5x better.

Because of the shared memory (the memory is reserved from the main memory), the graphics adapter performs significantly better with DDR3 main memory than with DDR2 (up to 33% more performance).

The current consumption of the mGPU is with a maximum of 12 Watt TDP (for the whole chipset (north- and southbridge are integrated) on par with the current Intel GMA X4500MHD (Centrino 2).

The chipset supports Hybrid-SLI (HybridPower) in conjunction with some GeForce 9x00M cards like the 9600M GT. HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. (in Windows Vista, XP is not supported and MacOs needs a reboot according to Nvidia - at time of announcement). GeForceBoost to boost the performance (using SLI) is not supported in the MacBook Pro.

As the 9500M G, the 9400M features 16 stream processors that do the work of the former dedicated pixel- and vertex-shaders. The unified shaders of Nvidia are 1-dimensional (AMD has 5-dimensional shaders which leads to the higher number of shaders).

The MCP79MX (codename of the GeForce 9400M) can help the CPU in decoding HD videos. It features the PureVideo HD engine (VP3 video processor). Furthermore, the chip can be programmed using CUDA and can accellerate some operations in Photoshop CS4.

At the same time the desktop 9300 and 9400 mGPU was presented, which should perform simillarly (the laptop chipset 9400M should perform a bit lower than the 9300).

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is the combination of a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS or 9200M GS graphics card and a 9100M G chipsetz graphics in SLI (GeForceBoost from Hybrid SLI) mode.

Do not mistake the combination with the Geforce 9400M chipset graphics card (e.g. found in the older MacBook models). However, the performance is similar to the 9400M G card.

It should be a little bit faster than a single 9300M GS and supports the dynamic switching between integrated and dedicated GPU.

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M Series
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 16 @ 0.45 GHz
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost 24 64 Bit
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 16 @ 0.45 GHz
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost 24 64 Bit
CodenameMCP79MX
Pipelines16 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz
Shader Speed1100 MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 10.0, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption12 Watt
Transistors282 Million
technology65 nm65 nm
FeaturesPureVideo HD VP3
Date of Announcement14.10.2008 03.06.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Memory Bus Width64 Bit

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
607 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
125 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
465 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
96 Points (0%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 5439     avg: 8199     median: 6427 (7%)     max: 13845 Points
9710 Points (10%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 3385     avg: 4132     median: 3616 (2%)     max: 5759 Points
5770 Points (3%)
4075 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark 06
min: 1118     avg: 1348     median: 1157 (2%)     max: 2000 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark 06
min: 1916     avg: 2092     median: 2113.5 (3%)     max: 2207 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark 06
1999 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
3DMark 06
1240 Points (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 5.1     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (67%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.9     avg: 4.3     median: 4.3 (54%)     max: 4.8 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
min: 5.1     avg: 5.2     median: 5.3 (78%)     max: 5.3 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.5 (81%)     max: 5.7 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 939     avg: 2231     median: 2326.5 (2%)     max: 4402 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost → 99% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
15.8 17 19.1 42 ~ 23 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
6.2  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
43 77 ~ 60 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
10 28 ~ 19 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
2  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
19 20.7 44 ~ 28 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
27  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
64  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
14.7 23 ~ 19 fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
36  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
11.9  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
17 60 ~ 39 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
11 17 ~ 14 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
9  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
33.1 70.5 ~ 52 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
27.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
12.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
8.9  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
22.8 30.4 32 ~ 28 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
11  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
6.3  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
21.4 28.3 30 ~ 27 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
10.5 11.3 ~ 11 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
5.4 5.8 ~ 6 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
15  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
5  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
3.3  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
42  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
95 188 222 ~ 168 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
39 53 60 ~ 51 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
10 15 27 ~ 17 fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
61  fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
56  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
45  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
39  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
54 136.9 ~ 95 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
41 43 ~ 42 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
11  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
35 44 ~ 40 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
86.3  fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
83.6  fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
84.1  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
83.3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE):
93.7 199.7 240 ~ 178 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Anno 1404236.2
Sims 360192
F.E.A.R. 22827
Left 4 Dead6419
Far Cry 23611.9
Racedriver: GRID39149
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare5227.1
Supreme Commander - FA Bench12.18.9
Crysis - GPU Benchmark2811.026.32
Crysis - CPU Benchmark27116
World in Conflict - Benchmark155
Call of Juarez Benchmark3.3
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark42
F.E.A.R.1685117
Quake 461564539
World of Warcraft954211
Counter-Strike Source40
Doom 386.383.684.183.3
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo178
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
3
5
1
8
3
1
11
3
1
1
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 02:30:00

#0 checking url part for id 1048 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 920 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.121s ... 0.122s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.122s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.122s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1048 +0.033s ... 0.155s

#8 got single benchmarks 1048 +0.048s ... 0.203s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 920 +0.002s ... 0.205s

#10 got single benchmarks 920 +0.009s ... 0.214s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.214s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.302s ... 0.516s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.516s

#14 Got 72 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.536s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.536s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.01s ... 0.546s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.05s ... 0.596s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.596s

#19 return log +0.077s ... 0.674s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)