Fujitsu-Siemens LifeBook A3120

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens LifeBook A3120

75% Fujitsu LifeBook A3120
Source: PC World Archive.org version
This consumer laptop has a unique touchpad and an attractive vanilla ice cream-colored case, but performance wanes under pressure. With such poor battery life, the LifeBook A3120 is a less-than-appealing choice for mobile warriors, and its speed is too sluggish to make it work as a desktop replacement. It's a looker, but its beauty is only skin deep.
Test ist nur in der Zeitschrift gedruckt

(von 100): 75, Leistung 53, Austattung 80, Preis/Leistung sehr günstig
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/09/2007
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 90% performance: 53% features: 80%

70% This sharp-looking multimedia machine has features you might not expect in a home notebook. Just keep it near a power outlet
Source: Laptop Mag Archive.org version
In laptop design, white is the new black. But the Fujitsu LifeBook A3120 is no mere knock-off of the Apple MacBook; its pleasing pearl-white finish has a distinctive look all its own. We wish it lasted a bit longer on a charge, but the Fujitsu A3120 is a good Vista notebook with plenty of style and durability. And it offers a lot of features for the price.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar

3.5 von 5, Display gut, Akkulaufzeit kurz
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/26/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80%

Comment

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150: Faster clocked Xpress 1100 onboard graphics card with x300 core. Should run Vista Aero Glass fluently.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

AMD Turion 64 X2: AMD Turion 64 X2 is intended to be positioned against the Intel Core Duo was presented in 17. May 2006. The current consumption is not higher than with Centrino-Duo-notebooks (TL-45 with ATI Xpress and Mobility Radeon X300). This means, that approximative the same battery runtime and fan functions can be expected (with this chipset). However, the performance was 20% below the T2300 (1.66 GHz) due to the lower L2 Cache (Core Duo has 2048 Kbyte shared L2 Cache). Nevertheless, the performance is sufficient.

TL-56:

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.