Fossibot F100 Series

Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.58 inch, 6.74 inch
Weight: 0.375kg, 0.495kg
Average of 1 scores (from 3 reviews)
Fossibot F102
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio G Helio G99
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G57 MP2
Display: 6.58 inch, 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.495kg
Links:
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android User

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2024
Fossibot F105
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek Mediatek MT8 Helio MT8768
Graphics Adapter: Imagination PowerVR GE8320
Display: 6.74 inch, 19:9, 1600 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.375kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2024
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Fossibot:
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
ARM Mali-G57 MP2: Integrated mid range graphics card with 2 clusters. Based on the Valhall architecture.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
Imagination PowerVR GE8320: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Mediatek Mediatek Helio G:
Helio G99: ARM based octa-core SoC with 2x big ARM Cortex-A76 cores and 6x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores. All clocked up to 2.2 GHz. Integrates a Cat-13 LTE Modem (4G) and a ARM Mali-G57 MP2 graphics card. Compared to the older Helio G96, the G99 is manufactured in the more recent 6nm process and clocks higher.
Mediatek Mediatek MT8:
Helio MT8768: ARM based octa core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2 GHz. The chip also includes an LTE modem.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
66%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.