Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos W920 vs Samsung Exynos W930 vs Samsung Exynos W1000

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

The Samsung Exynos W920 is a dual-core ARM based SoC for IoT (Internet of Things) devices like smartwatches. It was announced in 2021 and integrates two ARM Cortex A55 cores clocked at 1.18 GHz. It is manufactured in the modern 5nm process. In addition to the CPU cores, the chip also integrates a ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, Cat.4 (DL) / Cat.5 (UL) LTE modem, 1080p HEVC/H.264/VP8 video engine and a LPDDR4 memory controller.

Samsung Exynos W930

► remove from comparison  Exynos W930

The Samsung Exynos W930 is a SoC intended for smartwatches that was announced in mid 2023. It integrates two small ARM Cortex-A55 CPU cores at up to 1.4 GHz and an ARM Mali-G68MP2 GPU. The integrated LTE modem supports Cat.4 Download (150 Mbps) and Cat.5 Upload (75 Mbps). For satellite positioning, the SoC supports GPS, GLONASS, Beidou and Galileo. Furthermore, the package integrates 2GB LPDDR4 RAM and 16 GB eMMC.

The chip is manufactured in the relatively modern 5nm process at Samsung.

Samsung Exynos W1000

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W1000

The Samsung Exynos W1000 is a comparatively fast processor (SoC) for use in smart wearables that was unveiled in July 2024. It features 5 CPU cores (1 Cortex-A78 performance core and 4 Cortex-A55 efficient cores running at ~1.6 GHz and ~1.5 GHz respectively) along with a 4G LTE modem, satellite navigation module, and the Mali-G68 MP2 iGPU. Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 4 and NFC are all supported as well.

Performance

Octane and Speedometer put it in the same ballpark as the Snapdragon 680 4G. It must be said that the Exynos W930 and W920 both had just 2 CPU cores, meaning the jump in performance that the newer chip brings to the table is quite frankly staggering.

Graphics

We expect the Mali-G68 MP2 to be exactly as fast as the G57 MP2 (assuming the G68 MP2 is half as fast as the G68 MP4, which it should be). As a GPU unveiled in 2020, this humble Mali series member does not have hardware ray tracing or any other modern skills.

While the W930 and the W920 came equipped with the very same GPU, it probably runs at somewhat higher clock speeds in the W1000.

Power consumption

As an SoC for smartwatches, the Exynos is unlikely to ever consume more than 2 W or 3 W (even briefly) because that would obliterate the device's battery life.

The Exynos series SoC is built with a 3 nm process for good, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

ModelSamsung Exynos W920Samsung Exynos W930Samsung Exynos W1000
CodenameARM Cortex-A55ARM Cortex-A55
Clock1180 MHz1400 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 25 / 5
1 x ARM Cortex-A78
4 x ARM Cortex-A55
Technology5 nm5 nm3 nm
FeaturesMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps video2x 1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, ARM Mali-G68MP2, qHD (960x540) Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150MBps (DL), Cat.5 75Mbps (UL), GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, eMMC 16GB
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2ARM Mali-G68 MP2ARM Mali-G68 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comsemiconductor.samsung.com
TDP Turbo PL23 Watt

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
min: 14711.3     avg: 15205     median: 15204.8 (18%)     max: 15698.2 ms
min: 2801.5     avg: 2870     median: 2870.3 (3%)     max: 2939.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
min: 1444.1     avg: 1464     median: 1464.1 (16%)     max: 1484 ms
min: 481.8     avg: 486     median: 486 (5%)     max: 490.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points
min: 2575     avg: 2581     median: 2581 (2%)     max: 2587 Points
min: 12676     avg: 12783     median: 12783 (10%)     max: 12890 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W930 → 149% n=3

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W1000 → 628% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 05:35:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15094 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18011 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752809740s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#9 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15094 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 15094 +0.003s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18011 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#13 got single benchmarks 18011 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.023s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.023s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)