Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2400 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300

Samsung Exynos 2400

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 2400

The Samsung Exynos 2400 is a top-class SoC for smartphones and tablets. It integrates 10 ARMv9 CPU cores in 4 clusters.

The CPU performance in our benchmarks is comparable to an older Apple A15 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and remains slightly behind the current Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and also Apple A16 behind.

Samsung's integrated graphics card (iGPU) is an Xclipse 940 GPU which is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture.

Wireless connections can be established with the Exynos via 5G NR Sub-6GHz (9.64 GHz uplink), mmWave (12.1 GHz), GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo.

The Exynos 2400 is manufactured in the 4nm LPP+ process at Samsung.

MediaTek Dimensity 9300

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 9300

The MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (MT6989) is a high-end SoC for smartphones and tablets based on Android. For the first time, the CPU no longer uses classic energy-saving cores, but only so-called big cores. In this case, four Cortex-X4 cores with up to 3.25 GHz each and four additional Cortex-A720 cores with up to 2.0 GHz each. The manufacturer has also increased the level 3 and SLC cache by 29% compared to its predecessor, which now has a capacity of 18 MB.

In initial benchmarks with a Vivo X100 Pro, the performance is roughly comparable to an Apple A15 or a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The integrated MediaTek APU 790 fully relies on generative AI and aims to accelerate adapted algorithms by a factor of eight. Energy efficiency is said to have been improved by 45 percent. With the MiraVision 990, displays can be operated in Ultra HD at up to 120 Hz and Google Ultra HDR image display (from Android 14) is also supported.

The graphics unit is an ARM Immortalis-G720 MP12 is used.

The SoC is manufactured using the 3rd generation 4-nanometer process at TSMC (N4X).

ModelSamsung Exynos 2400MediaTek Dimensity 9300
CodenameCortex-X4 / A720 / A520Cortex-X4 / A720
Clock2000 - 3200 MHz2000 - 3250 MHz
Cores / Threads10 / 10
1 x 3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
2 x 2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
3 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A520
8 / 8
4 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Technology4 nm4 nm
iGPUSamsung Xclipse 940
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com
SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000
Series: Dimensity 9000 Cortex-X4 / A720
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ compare2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 « 2 - 3.25 GHz8 / 8 cores18 MB L3 Cortex-X4 / A720
L3 Cache18 MB
FeaturesARM Immortalis-G720 MP12, Wi-Fi 7 up to 6.5 GBit/s, Bluetooth 5.4, LPDDR5T-9600 @ 4800 MHz, Imagiq 990, AI 5G Modem up to 7 GBit/s,

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 7199     avg: 7215     median: 7215 (68%)     max: 7231 Points
7922 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 5232     avg: 6234     median: 6233.5 (71%)     max: 7235 Points
8749 Points (100%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2045     avg: 2056     median: 2055.5 (51%)     max: 2066 Points
2207 Points (55%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 6456     avg: 6495     median: 6495 (25%)     max: 6534 Points
7408 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1560     median: 1560 (61%)     max: 1567 Points
1604 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5561     avg: 5716     median: 5716 (10%)     max: 5871 Points
6681 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8889     avg: 8949     median: 8949 (89%)     max: 9009 Points
8787 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 25448     avg: 25723     median: 25723 (26%)     max: 25998 Points
26990 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 630.8     avg: 647     median: 646.6 (1%)     max: 662.3 ms
698 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
190.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 63452     avg: 63600     median: 63600 (48%)     max: 63748 Points
66656 Points (50%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
176 Points (48%)
183 Points (50%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
0 Points (0%)
199 Points (36%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
1484500 Points (72%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
317463 Points (79%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 1616400     avg: 1697140     median: 1697140 (56%)     max: 1777870 Points
2038810 Points (68%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 409658     avg: 418562     median: 418562 (12%)     max: 427465 Points
479443 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 64.4     avg: 65.6     median: 65.6 (45%)     max: 66.7 MB/s
136.2 MB/s (93%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 1108     avg: 1155     median: 1154.5 (33%)     max: 1201 MB/s
3236 MB/s (91%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 50     avg: 50.5     median: 50.5 (24%)     max: 50.9 MB/s
67.7 MB/s (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 2327     avg: 2336     median: 2336 (65%)     max: 2345 MB/s
1747 MB/s (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 21538     avg: 23407     median: 23407 (10%)     max: 25276 Points
46550 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 17534     avg: 17649     median: 17648.5 (65%)     max: 17763 Points
14573 Points (54%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1256     avg: 1273     median: 1273 (48%)     max: 1290 Points
1301 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 9.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 9.59 Watt
6.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.586     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.595 Watt
0.6 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2400 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 9300 → 126% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 00:22:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17426 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17401 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752704522s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17426 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 17426 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17401 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 17401 +0.005s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.029s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.045s

#14 return log +0s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)