AMD E-450 vs AMD E2-2000 vs AMD E2-1800

AMD E-450

► remove

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-2000

► remove

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

AMD E2-1800

► remove

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-450AMD E2-2000AMD E2-1800
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
» AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
1650 MHz1750 MHz1700 MHz
128 KB128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
103%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (13%)     max: 0.33 Points
103%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (13%)     max: 0.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (11%)     max: 1077 Points
104%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (11%)     max: 1128 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (3%)     max: 2082 Points
105%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (4%)     max: 2147 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (3%)     max: 2299 Points
105%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (3%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (11%)     max: 1180 Points
103%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (11%)     max: 1226 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 seconds
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2151.6 (25%)     max: 2380.5 seconds
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.623 seconds
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69 (14%)     max: 72.332 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (5%)     max: 499 KB/s
min: 456     avg: 482     median: 486 (5%)     max: 505 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (2%)
113%
1 E2-1800 +
3.3 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (6%)
113%
1 E2-1800 +
18.3 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
104%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (7%)     max: 1070 Points
105%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (7%)     max: 1124 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.688 Seconds
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 105     avg: 107     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 Seconds
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.85 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 Seconds
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2383.61 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 E-450 +
9480 MIPS (4%)
103%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 E-450 +
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
106%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 points
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.9 points (50%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (3%)     max: 2123 Points
105%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (3%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (3%)     max: 721 points
105%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (3%)     max: 740 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (6%)     max: 9853 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (3%)     max: 942 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)