AMD E-350 vs AMD E2-1800

AMD E-350

► remove

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-1800

► remove

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-350AMD E2-1800
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 (compare)1750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 (compare)1650 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 (compare)1480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 (compare)1300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 (compare)1500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 (compare)1750 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 (compare)1650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 (compare)1480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 (compare)1400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 (compare)1300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 (compare)1500 MHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1700 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.62 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (2%)     max: 0.66 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (14%)     max: 0.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 1029     avg: 1048.3     median: 1048.5 (11%)     max: 1064 Points
min: 997     avg: 1093.4     median: 1110 (12%)     max: 1128 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (4%)     max: 2080 Points
min: 2068     avg: 2115.3     median: 2121 (4%)     max: 2147 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 2034     avg: 2181.8     median: 2195.5 (3%)     max: 2250 Points
min: 2245     avg: 2312.2     median: 2321 (3%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (11%)     max: 1158 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1191.8     median: 1208 (12%)     max: 1226 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 2054     avg: 2129.9     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 seconds
min: 1900     avg: 2125.8     median: 2151.6 (25%)     max: 2380.5 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 seconds
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69 (14%)     max: 72.332 seconds
WinRAR - Result
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (6%)     max: 505 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
3.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
18.3 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (3%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 985     avg: 1015.9     median: 1021 (7%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 527     avg: 1025.2     median: 1082.5 (8%)     max: 1124 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 Seconds
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 Seconds
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.85 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2409.83     avg: 2465.9     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 Seconds
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2383.61 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9290     avg: 9646.7     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 points
3.9 points (50%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 1818     avg: 1932.7     median: 1982 (3%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1858     avg: 1999.6     median: 1993 (3%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (3%)     max: 690 points
min: 682     avg: 724.3     median: 736 (4%)     max: 740 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (6%)     max: 9853 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 935     avg: 938.5     median: 938.5 (3%)     max: 942 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
min: 1784     avg: 1788.5     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
min: 1939     avg: 1948.5     median: 1948.5 (6%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (5%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (7%)     max: 1787 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 102%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)