AMD E-300 vs AMD E-240

AMD E-300

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-300 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Furthermore, the E-300 also support HTMI 1.4a.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E-300AMD E-240
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
1300 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB64 KB
1 MB512 KB
2 / 21 / 1
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.5 Points
0.3 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-300 +
min: 0.24     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
853 (8%)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-300 +
1176 (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-300 +
min: 1714     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (2%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (7%)     max: 941 Points
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (8%)     max: 1043 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
2511 s (30%)
4472 s (53%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
79 s (16%)
137 s (28%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 836     avg: 839     median: 838.5 (5%)     max: 841 Points
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (3%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (13%)     max: 60 s
57.5 s (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 132     avg: 134     median: 133.5 (6%)     max: 135 s
120 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-300 +
min: 2920     avg: 2941     median: 2940.5 (13%)     max: 2961 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.4 Points (44%)
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-300 +
min: 1544     avg: 1580     median: 1579.5 (2%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 85% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)