, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E-240 vs AMD E1-1500

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E1-1500

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1500 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the old E1-1200, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1500 offers an 80 MHz higher CPU and 29 MHz higher GPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1500 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1500 the 7310 is clocked at 529 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's similar to Intels (faster) Ivy and Sandy Bridge ULV-CPUs.

AMD E-240AMD E1-1500
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
1500 MHz1480 MHz
64 KB128 KB
512 KB1 MB
1 / 12 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-240 +
0.3 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (7%)     max: 1043 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E-240 +
4472 s (53%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E-240 +
137 s (28%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (3%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E-240 +
57.5 s (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E-240 +
120 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E-240 +
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 21. 10:49:02

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3634 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.008s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3634 +0s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 3634 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.023s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)