Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J3455 vs Intel Celeron N3150

Intel Celeron J3455

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J3455

The Intel Celeron J3355 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and Mini-PCs and was announced in late 2016. It runs at 1.5 - 2.3 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Apollo Lake platform. Similar to the Braswell predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process (P1273) with FinFETs. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 1866/2400 MHz).

Architecture

For the first time in a couple of years, Intel completely reworked the CPU architecture of the Atom series. The manufacturer advertises performance gains of roughly 30 percent, but does not reveal any specifics about the individual changes. The new Goldmont architecture should therefore be roughly on par with AMD's Beema/Carrizo-L APUs in terms of per-MHz performance, but it still far behind the more expensive Core CPUs (like Skylake / Kaby Lake).

Performance

The CPU performance of the Celeron J3455 is between the mobile Celeron N3450 and Pentium N4200 in the lower range of mobile processors. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for light tasks with not much multitasking (office, browsing).

GPU Performance

The HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics (Braswell). This means only older and simpler titles will run smoothly.

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power Consumption

The Celeron J3455 is specified at 10 Watt TDP and therefore 4 Watts higher than the slightly faster Pentium N4200.

Intel Celeron N3150

Intel N3150

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been presented in early 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2930). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2930 (1.8 - 2.2 GHz) or the competing AMD APU E2-6110, the N3150 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron J3455Intel Celeron N3150
CodenameApollo LakeBraswell
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron J3455 « 1.5 - 2.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3450 compare1.1 - 2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J3355 compare2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3350 compare1.1 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 « 1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1500 - 2300 MHz1600 - 2080 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1296FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics 500 (12 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 , 8x USB 3.0, 6x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 500 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
118 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
32 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N3150 +
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N3150 +
1085 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N3150 +
3624 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N3150 +
945 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N3150 +
30.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N3150 +
915 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N3150 +
9 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N3150 +
44.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3150 +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3150 +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3150 +
0.8 GB/s (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3150 +
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N3150 +
41 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N3150 +
90.2 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N3150 +
1939 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1516 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
15395 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1311 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N3150 +
1925 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
293 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1024 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
850 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3150 +
2423 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3150 +
2167 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3150 +
3246 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3150 +
3347 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3150 +
2983 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N3150 +
7863 ms (9%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3150 +
412.3 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3150 +
3963 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J3455 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3150 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 14. 23:50:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13183 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6780 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1768431059s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:44:35 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13183 +0s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 13183 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6780 +0s ... 0.004s

#10 got single benchmarks 6780 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.005s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.013s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.016s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)