Averatec 2575

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Averatec 2575

60% Averatec Voya 2575 Ultraportable Laptop PC
Source: Comp Reviews Archive.org version
Averatec's Voya 2575 retains much of the same low cost as their previous laptops, but they have improved the overall quality of the design. It is certainly fairly large and heavier than most 12-inch laptops on the market but it provides a good overall experience. It just lacks many of the features one might expect to see in a modern notebook.
3 von 5, Preis gut, Mobilität schlecht
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 09/09/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 80% mobility: 40%

70% Averatec 2575
Source: CNet Archive.org version
Since we reviewed the Averatec 2371 last year, the company has taken its laptops in a whole new direction. Gone are the cheap-looking plastic cases and rock-bottom prices; Though its performance is merely adequate, the ultraportable Averatec 2575 offers an attractive design and a decent feature set at a reasonable price.
7.0 von 10, Preis gut, Display mäßig, Leistung schlecht, Mobilität sehr schlecht
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/05/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 30%

Averatec AV2575 Review
Source: Notebookreview.com Archive.org version
The Averatec 12.1" ultraportable AV2575 notebook offers a great value at a price of $1,099. While it is heavier than other notebooks of this size, the build quality, keyboard, touchpad, and thermal performance is excellent. The one area that I could see some improvement on is battery life, which hopefully an extended battery would help with.
Emissionen sehr gut, Leistung mangelhaft, Preis sehr gut, Verarbeitung ausgezeichnet, Mobilität mangelhaft
User Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2008
Rating: price: 90% performance: 50% mobility: 50% workmanship: 95% emissions: 90%

Comment

ATI Radeon Xpress X1270: Built in RS690T chipset and is based on an X700 graphics core (with less pipelines). It features no dedicated graphics memory but Vista Aero support.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

AMD Turion 64 X2: AMD Turion 64 X2 is intended to be positioned against the Intel Core Duo was presented in 17. May 2006. The current consumption is not higher than with Centrino-Duo-notebooks (TL-45 with ATI Xpress and Mobility Radeon X300). This means, that approximative the same battery runtime and fan functions can be expected (with this chipset). However, the performance was 20% below the T2300 (1.66 GHz) due to the lower L2 Cache (Core Duo has 2048 Kbyte shared L2 Cache). Nevertheless, the performance is sufficient.

TL-64:

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

12.10":

This range of display format is largely the upper limit for tablets and the lower limit for subnotebooks.

The advantage of subnotebooks is that the entire laptop can be small in size and therefore easily portable. The tiny display has the added advantage of requiring little power, which further improves battery life and thus mobility. The disadvantage is that reading texts is exhausting for the eyes. High resolutions, which one is used to from a standard laptop, are almost not usable.

The same applies to tablets in this size range.

Averatec: Averatec is a low-cost laptop computer manufacturer based in California. Founded in 1984 as Sotec, it promoted low-cost PCs manufactured in Taiwan. In the early 2000s the company renamed itself as Averatec. They have operations in North America, Europe, Taiwan and South Korea. Their systems are produced in China and Korea. Some laptops are rebranded from other companies. In 2008, Averatec became a label of TriGem, a Korean company. Averatec is a small international manufacturer with low global market share. Notebook models of Averatec rarely have been reviewed in the German- and English speaking countries.

Averatec reviews

65%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

Devices from the same Manufacturer