Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 725

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 725

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 725

The Qualcomm Adreno 725 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen. 2 and is designed for smartphones as well as tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced at the beginning of 2023. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 100 percent compared with the predecessor Adreno 644.

The Adreno 725 supports all common Android APIs like Vulkan 1.1 and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 engine.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 725
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.10.2023 30.11.2021
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 725GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 28 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 13910     avg: 20912     median: 22262 (97%)     max: 23024 Points
11837 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 38076     avg: 43860     median: 44924 (99%)     max: 45492 Points
20476 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 11753     avg: 17435     median: 19153 (95%)     max: 20131 Points
10274 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 24304     avg: 30514     median: 32235 (97%)     max: 33376 Points
14801 Points (44%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 16691     avg: 19217     median: 19516.5 (10%)     max: 20068 Points
7701 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 4690     avg: 4976     median: 5013 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
1968 Points (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 32     avg: 38     median: 38 (15%)     max: 42 fps
16 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 77.5     median: 83 (15%)     max: 96 fps
34 fps (6%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 192     median: 199.5 (15%)     max: 241 fps
35 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 142.1     median: 156 (18%)     max: 162 fps
79 fps (9%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 240.3     median: 253 (5%)     max: 279 fps
137 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 316     median: 327 (19%)     max: 363 fps
232 fps (14%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 189     avg: 491.3     median: 535 (4%)     max: 549 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 725
359 fps (3%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 748439     median: 755643 (94%)     max: 784286 Points
min: 333810     avg: 347058     median: 347058 (43%)     max: 360306 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
212.3 fps (1%)
120.9 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 14007     median: 14200 (4%)     max: 14956 Points
4056 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 16185     median: 16346 (5%)     max: 16867 Points
5338 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.24     avg: 10     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 15.2 Watt
6.3 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 46% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 725:
56  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
53%
Adreno 725:
32  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Adreno 725:
54  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4 60 89 90 90 ~ 78 fps
77%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59 59.3 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 725:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.9 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 725:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
60 103 ~ 82 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 725 → 83%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 83%

Qualcomm Adreno 750lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact60
PUBG Mobile78606040
Dead Trigger 282
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2


1

1
2

1
1






Qualcomm Adreno 725lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5632
Armajet54
PUBG Mobile606040
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 09. 19:50:16

#0 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11590 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 May 2024 05:40:33 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.121s ... 0.122s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.122s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.122s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0.027s ... 0.15s

#8 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.034s ... 0.183s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11590 +0.002s ... 0.186s

#10 got single benchmarks 11590 +0.01s ... 0.196s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.196s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.097s ... 0.293s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.293s

#14 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.308s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.308s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.31s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.013s ... 0.324s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.324s

#19 return log +0.044s ... 0.367s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)