Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 308 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 302

Qualcomm Adreno 308

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 308

The Qualcomm Adreno 308 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 425-series. Like the other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 308 most likely also features 24 ALUs (unified shaders). More information on the architecture of the A3xx series can be found on github.com.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

Qualcomm Adreno 308Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 302
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 330 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 6
Adreno 306 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified6 - unified
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIDirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm4 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpen CL 1.1e, RenderscriptOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement11.02.2016 25.10.2023 20.06.2013
Core Speed400 MHz
CPU in Adreno 308GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917)4 x 1400 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 2154 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (0%)     max: 3678 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (0%)     max: 4482 Points
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
18048%
1 Adreno 750 +
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
29890 Points (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 308
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
1316 Points (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
3442 Points (8%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (1%)     max: 2780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 9113% n=2

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 52% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 308:
22  fps
400%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 308:
30 31 31 ~ 31 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 308:
28 30 31 ~ 30 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 308:
29 41.5 47 ~ 39 fps
high
100%
Adreno 308:
34.5 39 ~ 37 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 308:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
267%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 308:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 308:
18 18 ~ 18 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 308:
49  fps
high
100%
Adreno 308:
27  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 308:
54  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 308 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 333%

Qualcomm Adreno 308Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 302
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal60
Genshin Impact5359.857
PUBG Mobile2288605840
Dead Trigger 23080
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
Qualcomm Adreno 308Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 302
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1






1










< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2

1
1

2
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 07. 15:29:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751894998s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:22:05 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.033s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7906 +0.019s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 7906 +0.018s ... 0.071s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.071s

#12 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.03s ... 0.102s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0s ... 0.102s

#14 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.009s ... 0.111s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.116s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.118s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.119s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.12s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.12s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.121s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.123s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.124s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.124s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.125s

#26 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.134s

#27 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.134s

#28 Got 85 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 0.155s

#29 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.155s

#30 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.156s

#31 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.159s

#32 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.159s

#33 return log +0s ... 0.16s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)