Acer Aspire 5112WLMi

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Acer Aspire 5112WLMi

70% Acer Aspire 5112 Review
Source: OurNotebookReviews Archive.org version
Overall it’s satisfying but not something to be proud of. It’s futureproof, it has decent graphics, fast enough; Most Important, it’s a GOOD DEAL for me
umfangreicher Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar

zufriedenstellend, Preis/Leistung gut, Leistung gut, Mobilität gut, Verarbeitung zufriedenstellend
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/13/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%

90% Acer Aspire 5112 Review
Source: notebookforums.com Archive.org version
It's GREAT. It's only 1300$ (best deal for me 2 months ago). It can handle NFS Most Wanted and Carbon at 800x600 res, MAX details smoothly . You'll find it a little bit slow at max res (1024x768). It scores 2500 3d05 marks. Not yet on PCmark05. It's design's average. Build quality's not bad. Screen resolution and angle is enough for me.
kurzer subjektiver Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar

(von 10): sehr gut, Verarbeitung 6, Leistung 8, Display 7, Akkulaufzeit 7, Preis/Leistung 7
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/12/2006
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% workmanship: 60%

Foreign Reviews

Acer Aspire 5112WLMi
Source: Stiftung Warentest DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: performance: 88% display: 83% ergonomy: 87%

Fazit zum Notebooktest des Acer Aspire 5112 WLMi
Source: AMD-Notebook-Tester Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Review Type Unknown, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/28/2006

Comment

ATI Mobility Radeon X1600: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 is a middle class graphic card for notebooks of the X1000 series. Its performance can be compared with NVIDIA GeForce Go 7600.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

AMD Turion 64 X2: AMD Turion 64 X2 is intended to be positioned against the Intel Core Duo was presented in 17. May 2006. The current consumption is not higher than with Centrino-Duo-notebooks (TL-45 with ATI Xpress and Mobility Radeon X300). This means, that approximative the same battery runtime and fan functions can be expected (with this chipset). However, the performance was 20% below the T2300 (1.66 GHz) due to the lower L2 Cache (Core Duo has 2048 Kbyte shared L2 Cache). Nevertheless, the performance is sufficient.

TL-50: In 90nm produced dual core processor with a low clock rate of 1.6 GHz. The TL-50 is still based on the K8 core and compareable to a slower clocked Core Duo.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.