Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9420e vs AMD E2-9010

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

AMD E2-9010

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9010

The AMD E2-9010 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in mid 2016. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.0-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9010 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD A9-9420eAMD E2-9010
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
Clock <=2500? MHz2000 - 2200 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
TDP10-15 Watt
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge E2-9010

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
91 Points (1%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
53 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1871 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3268 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1142 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
37.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-9010 +
769 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-9010 +
7.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-9010 +
39.2 fps (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.7 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
27.9 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
61.5 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1296 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1241 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
12726 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
919 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1268 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1610 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2402 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1512 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2307 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2348 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1415 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2484 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1516 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3104 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2675 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3377 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2957 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3062 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3043 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
234.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
10419 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9010 → 94% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 21:38:03

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8183 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#20 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 8183 +0s ... 0.017s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#28 got single benchmarks 8183 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.029s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#70 return log +0.004s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)