Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A9-9420e vs AMD E2-9010 vs AMD A6-9210

AMD A9-9420e

► remove from comparison AMD A9-9420e

The AMD A9-9420e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation). It was first found in the Dell Inspiron 3000 with passive cooling and 4 GB DDR4 RAM. The performance in that device was way below the normal A9-9420 as the clock speed only reached up to 2,5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9420 between 10-25 Watts, but the passively cooled A9-9420e should be positioned lower than 9 Watt.

AMD E2-9010

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9010

The AMD E2-9010 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in mid 2016. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.0-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9010 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

AMD A6-9210

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9210

The AMD A6-9210 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A6-9210 is the mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.4-2.8 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A6-9210 should be noticeably slower than the A9-9410.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 600 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9210 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD A9-9420eAMD E2-9010AMD A6-9210
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94253.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94203 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92252.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-92202.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-92102.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90102 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
Clock <=2500? MHz2000 - 2200 MHz2400 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
TDP10-15 Watt10-15 Watt
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge E2-9010AMD Bristol Ridge A6-9210
L1 Cache1 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (1%)
91 Points (1%)
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
53 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1871 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3268 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1142 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
37.1 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-9010 +
769 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-9010 +
7.4 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-9010 +
39.2 fps (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-9010 +
0.7 GB/s (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
27.9 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
61.5 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1296 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1241 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
12726 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
919 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1268 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1610 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2402 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1512 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2307 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2348 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1415 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2484 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9010 +
1516 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3104 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2675 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3377 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9010 +
2957 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3062 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
3043 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9010 +
234.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E2-9010 +
10419 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9420e → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9010 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 22:45:35

#0 checking url part for id 10052 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8183 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8182 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.017s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10052 +0s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 10052 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8183 +0.001s ... 0.025s

#13 got single benchmarks 8183 +0.008s ... 0.034s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 8182 +0s ... 0.034s

#15 got single benchmarks 8182 +0.007s ... 0.041s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.047s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.06s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#55 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#56 return log +0s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)