Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad

► remove from comparison Samsung 4412 Quad

The Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (also called Exynos 4412, introduced in 2012) is an ARM SoC for tablets and smartphones. It includes a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A9 architecture (including NEON SIMD extension), which clocks with 1.4 to 1.6 GHz (depending on the model). Thus, the computing power is similar to competitors like Nvidia's Tegra 3 SoC. The memory controller supports LPDDR2, DDR2 and DDR3 with a maximum of two 32-bit channels and 400 MHz clock speed, resulting in a bandwidth of up to 6.4 GB/s.

The SoC integrates an ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU (15.8 GFLOPS at 440 MHz). Typical smartphone games (2012) will run fluently even in high resolutions like 1280 x 720 pixels. Videos can be accelerated by a multi-format video decoder (1080p AVI, WMV, H.264, H.263, VC1, MPEG2, MPEG4).

The chip is produced in Samsung fabs in 32nm HKMG and mainly found in high-end devices like the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Note 2. Depending on the clock speed, the power consumption should be between 2 and 4 W (estimated).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 400 MSM8928

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is an entry-level ARM-SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It offers four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at up to 1.6 GHz (Quad-Core) as well as an Adreno 305 graphics card. Furthermore, a HSPA+/LTE radio is integrated in the SoC, which is manufactured in a 28-nanometer LP process.

ModelSamsung Exynos 4412 QuadQualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex A9ARMv7
Series: Snapdragon ARMv7
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 « 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
Clock1400 - 1600 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology32 nm28 nm
FeaturesNEON, Mali 400MP4, Memory ControllerAdreno 305 GPU, LPDDR2/3 Memory Controller, GSM/UMTS/WCDMA/LTE
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 305

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 8282     avg: 9127     median: 9127 (7%)     max: 9972 Points
min: 7756     avg: 8177     median: 8177 (7%)     max: 8598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 7704     avg: 8386     median: 8696 (7%)     max: 8759 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 7913     avg: 8927     median: 9016 (8%)     max: 9761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
785 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
441 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1100 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1109     avg: 1309     median: 1338 (2%)     max: 1451 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 338     avg: 393.3     median: 398.5 (8%)     max: 438 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 613     avg: 693     median: 698 (6%)     max: 795 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 783     avg: 1234     median: 1282 (12%)     max: 1646 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 2661     avg: 2896     median: 2911.5 (6%)     max: 3171 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 1537     avg: 1675     median: 1656.5 (3%)     max: 1816 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1804     avg: 1915     median: 1886.5 (5%)     max: 2146 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 69.8     avg: 148.8     median: 162.8 (6%)     max: 202.1 MFLOPS
min: 150.1     avg: 221.7     median: 249.9 (8%)     max: 265 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 53.2     avg: 58.4     median: 56.3 (6%)     max: 66.9 MFLOPS
min: 67.9     avg: 87.9     median: 97.7 (10%)     max: 98 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 12714     avg: 14100     median: 13858 (16%)     max: 15968 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1109 ms (12%)
min: 1207     avg: 1429     median: 1404.5 (15%)     max: 1701 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1027     avg: 1304     median: 1353 (13%)     max: 1574 ms
1529 ms (14%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1894     avg: 2330     median: 2335 (2%)     max: 2755 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
771 Points (21%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1248 Points (28%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1881 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 4918     avg: 5460     median: 5357 (12%)     max: 6207 points
min: 9699     avg: 9949     median: 9948.5 (23%)     max: 10198 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 4282     avg: 6753     median: 7142.5 (46%)     max: 7770 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
17354 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
19444 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
24799 Points (8%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
289 Iter./s (9%)
min: 290     avg: 341     median: 341 (10%)     max: 392 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
10134 Iter./s (33%)
min: 5540     avg: 6590     median: 6590 (22%)     max: 7640 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10466 Points (1%)
min: 7044     avg: 7929     median: 7929 (1%)     max: 8814 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2383 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 → 117% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 00:54:59

#0 checking url part for id 3331 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6034 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3331 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#7 got single benchmarks 3331 +0.017s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6034 +0.003s ... 0.043s

#9 got single benchmarks 6034 +0.015s ... 0.058s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.033s ... 0.091s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.094s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.095s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.049s ... 0.144s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.157s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.157s

#17 return log +0.024s ... 0.181s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)