Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435

► remove Qualcomm 435

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 (SD435) is a lower mainstream SoC for (Android based) smartphones and tablets. Contrary to the Snapdragon 630, it is still manufactured in a 28-nm process and also consists of an octa-core CPU part with ARM Cortex-A53 cores. However, they are only clocked at up to 1.4 GHz. The integrated X9 LTE modem supports Cat. 4 with maximum transfer rates of 300 Mbps (downstream) and 100 Mbps (upstream). The SoC also includes an Adreno 505 GPU with support for Vulkan and OpenGL ES 3.1. WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.1 are supported as well. The memory controller supports LPDDR3 clocked at 800 MHz (so probably dual-channel DDRL-1600). The main difference to the Snapdragon 430 is the faster LTE modem.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

► remove Qualcomm 410 MSM8916

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (MSM8916) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 435Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (compare)1800 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 (compare)1700 MHz4 / 4
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 4351400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (compare)1400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 (compare)1400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (compare)1400 MHz4 / 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM89161400 MHz4 / 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 (compare)2200 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (compare)1800 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 (compare)1500 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 (compare)1700 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 (compare)1700 MHz4 / 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4351400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) (compare)1400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 (compare)1400 MHz8 / 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) (compare)1400 MHz4 / 4
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM89161400 MHz4 / 4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
1400 MHz1400 MHz
8 / 84 / 4
28 28
Adreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac WLAN, Bluetooth 4.1, LTE Cat. 7, Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerAdreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, LTE, FM, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505Qualcomm Adreno 306 (450 MHz)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
435 +
7935 Points (5%)
min: 6321     avg: 8611.3     median: 8707.5 (6%)     max: 9385 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
100%
435 +
7745 Points (10%)
min: 6470     avg: 8597.2     median: 8739 (11%)     max: 9544 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
100%
435 +
min: 8905     avg: 9085.6     median: 9027 (11%)     max: 9345 Points
min: 6291     avg: 9032     median: 9106 (12%)     max: 10148 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
100%
435 +
min: 1028     avg: 1210     median: 1212 (34%)     max: 1352 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
100%
435 +
min: 1002     avg: 1182.2     median: 1137 (32%)     max: 1382 Points
min: 579     avg: 687.7     median: 714 (20%)     max: 770 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1170     avg: 1414.3     median: 1426 (5%)     max: 1563 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 462     avg: 479.7     median: 476 (10%)     max: 528 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1350     avg: 1435.1     median: 1423.5 (4%)     max: 1561 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 443     avg: 476     median: 473 (10%)     max: 526 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute RenderScript Score
100%
435 +
1335 Points (11%)
625 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
435 +
2308 Points (8%)
918 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
435 +
577 Points (10%)
391 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
100%
435 +
min: 637     avg: 658.1     median: 656.5 (11%)     max: 678 Points
min: 515     avg: 516     median: 516 (9%)     max: 517 Points
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
100%
435 +
min: 2210     avg: 2616.6     median: 2681 (7%)     max: 2889 Points
min: 1261     avg: 1322     median: 1322 (4%)     max: 1383 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 0     avg: 180.6     median: 220.5 (7%)     max: 266.456 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 0     avg: 83.8     median: 105.3 (10%)     max: 117.086 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
100%
435 +
min: 11007     avg: 12498.4     median: 12635 (21%)     max: 13586.4 ms
min: 11843     avg: 14378.3     median: 13968 (23%)     max: 20618 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
100%
435 +
1978.7 ms (49%)
min: 1021.9     avg: 1395     median: 1380 (34%)     max: 1760.4 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1261.5     avg: 1372     median: 1372 (13%)     max: 1482.5 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 2689     avg: 3080.7     median: 3167 (7%)     max: 3314 Points
min: 1447     avg: 2659     median: 2737.5 (6%)     max: 3296 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
min: 720     avg: 862.1     median: 799 (21%)     max: 1219 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
min: 966     avg: 1164.6     median: 1164 (26%)     max: 1313 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
min: 1929     avg: 2030.3     median: 2024 (27%)     max: 2139 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
min: 11992     avg: 13833.5     median: 13943.5 (32%)     max: 15455 points
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
20844 (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 20041     avg: 21467.2     median: 21313 (26%)     max: 23242 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
100%
435 +
min: 42643     avg: 44705.4     median: 44895.5 (19%)     max: 46814 Points
min: 18230     avg: 24858.7     median: 26409 (11%)     max: 28232 Points
AndEBench - Java
min: 403     avg: 540     median: 405 (12%)     max: 812 Iter./s
AndEBench - Native
min: 6416     avg: 7524.3     median: 7580 (25%)     max: 8577 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
100%
435 +
81667 Points (18%)
min: 9346     avg: 10830.3     median: 9857 (2%)     max: 13288 Points
PCMark for Android - Computer Vision score
100%
435 +
min: 1646     avg: 1875.5     median: 1875.5 (31%)     max: 2105 Points
1635 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - Storage score
100%
435 +
min: 4303     avg: 6882.5     median: 6882.5 (45%)     max: 9462 Points
2006 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
100%
435 +
min: 3606     avg: 3762.6     median: 3744 (36%)     max: 3928 Points
min: 2217     avg: 2943.7     median: 2913 (28%)     max: 3701 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
100%
435 +
min: 0     avg: 4407.3     median: 4843 (46%)     max: 5438 Points
min: 2217     avg: 3493     median: 3691 (35%)     max: 4126 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
473 Points (52%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 → 84%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)