Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 vs Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad

Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison Samsung 4210 1.2 GHz

The Samsung Exynos 4 Dual (formerly known as Exynos 4210) is a dual-core Cortex-A9 based SoC with a ARM Mali-400 MP4 graphics card. Clocked at 1.2 GHz (CPU), the 4210 was used in the Galaxy S II and Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus.

Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930

► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Plus MSM8930

The Qualcomm MSM8930 (Snapdragon S4 Plus series) is an ARM based high-end smartphone SoC in 2012. It contains two Krait (ARMv7) CPU cores at up to 1.2 GHz, a Adreno 305 GPU, a single channel LPDDR2 memory controller and LTE radio elements.  The chip is produced in 28nm LP (low power process) at TSMC. Compared to the MSM8960, the 8930 is lower clocked, offers only a single channel memory controller, but has a faster GPU.

The Krait cores should offer a slightly better performance as the standard Cortex-A9 cores and are compatible to the NEON SIMD extensions.

Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad

► remove from comparison Samsung 4412 Quad

The Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (also called Exynos 4412, introduced in 2012) is an ARM SoC for tablets and smartphones. It includes a quad-core processor based on the Cortex-A9 architecture (including NEON SIMD extension), which clocks with 1.4 to 1.6 GHz (depending on the model). Thus, the computing power is similar to competitors like Nvidia's Tegra 3 SoC. The memory controller supports LPDDR2, DDR2 and DDR3 with a maximum of two 32-bit channels and 400 MHz clock speed, resulting in a bandwidth of up to 6.4 GB/s.

The SoC integrates an ARM Mali-400 MP4 GPU (15.8 GFLOPS at 440 MHz). Typical smartphone games (2012) will run fluently even in high resolutions like 1280 x 720 pixels. Videos can be accelerated by a multi-format video decoder (1080p AVI, WMV, H.264, H.263, VC1, MPEG2, MPEG4).

The chip is produced in Samsung fabs in 32nm HKMG and mainly found in high-end devices like the Samsung Galaxy S3 or Note 2. Depending on the clock speed, the power consumption should be between 2 and 4 W (estimated).

ModelSamsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHzQualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
CodenameCortex A9ARMv7Cortex A9
Series: Exynos Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89281.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80281.6 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89601.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM89261.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM82261.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ80261.2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82271 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM86601.7 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM82601.5 GHz2 / 2 cores ARMv7
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD82501 GHz1 / 1 cores ARMv7
Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4212 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.4 GHz1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex A9
Clock1200 MHz1200 MHz1400 - 1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 24 / 4
Technology45 nm28 nm32 nm
FeaturesNEON, Mali 400MP, Memory ControllerHSPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, GPS, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, FMNEON, Mali 400MP4, Memory Controller
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.samsung.com
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 305

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 4629     avg: 4635     median: 4635 (4%)     max: 4641 Points
min: 8282     avg: 9127     median: 9127 (7%)     max: 9972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
4684 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
788 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
432 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 571     avg: 585     median: 584.5 (5%)     max: 598 Points
min: 613     avg: 693     median: 698 (6%)     max: 795 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1449     avg: 1473     median: 1472.5 (13%)     max: 1496 Points
min: 783     avg: 1234     median: 1282 (12%)     max: 1646 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 1778     avg: 1814     median: 1814 (4%)     max: 1850 Points
min: 2661     avg: 2896     median: 2911.5 (6%)     max: 3171 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 798     avg: 826     median: 825.5 (2%)     max: 853 Points
min: 1537     avg: 1675     median: 1656.5 (3%)     max: 1816 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 1248     avg: 1277     median: 1276.5 (3%)     max: 1305 Points
min: 1804     avg: 1915     median: 1886.5 (5%)     max: 2146 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
67.4 MFLOPS (2%)
min: 146.9     avg: 205.6     median: 211.6 (7%)     max: 258.3 MFLOPS
min: 69.8     avg: 148.8     median: 162.8 (6%)     max: 202.1 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
45.9 MFLOPS (4%)
min: 25.25     avg: 106.5     median: 144.3 (14%)     max: 150 MFLOPS
min: 53.2     avg: 58.4     median: 56.3 (6%)     max: 66.9 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
18650 ms (22%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2178 ms (21%)
min: 1147     avg: 1282     median: 1224 (12%)     max: 1474 ms
min: 1027     avg: 1304     median: 1353 (13%)     max: 1574 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1144     avg: 1189     median: 1189 (13%)     max: 1234 ms
1109 ms (12%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
3219 points (7%)
min: 4557     avg: 4588     median: 4588 (11%)     max: 4619 points
min: 4918     avg: 5460     median: 5357 (12%)     max: 6207 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
min: 3235     avg: 3312     median: 3311.5 (22%)     max: 3388 Points
min: 4282     avg: 6753     median: 7142.5 (46%)     max: 7770 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
11026 Points (26%)
13681 Points (32%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
135 Iter./s (4%)
199 Iter./s (6%)
289 Iter./s (9%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
4300 Iter./s (14%)
4569 Iter./s (15%)
10134 Iter./s (33%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
3464 Points (0%)
10466 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4210 1.2 GHz → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 → 189% n=6

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 4412 Quad → 182% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 15. 05:20:01

#0 checking url part for id 3212 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3725 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3331 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3212 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 3212 +0.01s ... 0.042s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3725 +0.003s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 3725 +0.019s ... 0.064s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3331 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#12 got single benchmarks 3331 +0.023s ... 0.09s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.116s ... 0.206s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.206s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)