Notebookcheck Logo

AMD 3015Ce vs AMD 3015e

AMD 3015Ce

► remove from comparison AMD 3015Ce

The AMD 3015Ce (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. It is the Chromebook version of the AMD 3015e with identical specifications. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

AMD compares the performance of the 3015e (and therefore also the identical 3015Ce) against the entry level Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom). The 3015e should be 36% faster in single thread Cinebench R20 test. This is expected as the Atom cores offer a low single thread performance. Multi-thread benchmarks were not provided, so we guess the N4120 will be faster with its 4 cores. In PCMark 10 the 3015e should be 18% faster and in the 3DMark Night Raid the integrated GPU should beat the UHD Graphics 600 in the N4120 by 24%.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD 3015e

► remove from comparison AMD 3015e

The AMD 3015e (Codename Dali) is a mobile APU that integrates two Zen cores (with SMT, therefore 4 threads) clocked at 1.2 to 2.3 GHz. The TDP is specified at 6 Watt and therefore the chip can be passively cooled. The integrated Radeon graphics card offers 3 CUs at up to 600 MHz (Radeon RX Vega 3). The single channel memory controller supports only DDR4-1600. The chip is manufactured in 14nm and officially counted to the 3000 series of mobile processors.

AMD compares the performance of the 3015e against the entry level Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom). The 3015e should be 36% faster in single thread Cinebench R20 test. This is expected as the Atom cores offer a low single thread performance. Multi-thread benchmarks were not provided, so we guess the N4120 will be faster with its 4 cores. In PCMark 10 the 3015e should be 18% faster and in the 3DMark Night Raid the integrated GPU should beat the UHD Graphics 600 in the N4120 by 24%.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

ModelAMD 3015CeAMD 3015e
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZen
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD 3015Ce1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H compare3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e compare1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
» AMD 3015e1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3015Ce1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Clock1200 - 2300 MHz1200 - 2300 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFT5FT5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3015Ce +
35423 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3015Ce +
2475 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
564 Points (25%)
464 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1135 Points (4%)
860 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 3015Ce +
1415 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 3015Ce +
344.3 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
23395 Points (24%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
118 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 3015Ce +
24872 Points (67%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 3015Ce +
9775 Points (51%)
CrXPRT 2 - CrXPRT2 Performance Score
100%
1 3015Ce +
71 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 3015Ce +
5.7 Watt (18%)
0123456Tooltip

Average Benchmarks AMD 3015Ce → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD 3015e → 79% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 16:58:44

#0 checking url part for id 14368 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12718 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.01s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#27 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#28 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 14368 +0s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#32 got single benchmarks 14368 +0.006s ... 0.019s

#33 getting avg benchmarks for device 12718 +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#35 got single benchmarks 12718 +0.005s ... 0.024s

#36 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.025s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#50 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#52 return log +0.004s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)