Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1047UE vs Intel Celeron 1020E vs Intel Celeron 1005M

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

Intel Celeron 1020E

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1020E is an entry level dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Compared to previous generations, the 1020E should be similar fast as a Pentium B980.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 650 MHz up to 1000 MHz with Turbo Boost. Only some older and less demanding games can be played fluently in low settings.

Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1005M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1005M is an entry-level dual-core processor clocked at 1.9 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000 MHz) and a reduced feature set compared to the faster Core processors. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are all disabled.

Compared to previous generations, the 1005M is similar in performance to a Pentium B940. Like many Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

ModelIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 1020EIntel Celeron 1005M
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020E2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1005M « 1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1000M1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1017U1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 1019Y1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores1 MB L3
Clock1400 MHz2200 MHz1900 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketBGABGArPGA988B
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$134 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size94 mm2

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 24. 22:05:07

#0 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3598 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3945 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.032s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0.002s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3598 +0.002s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 3598 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3945 +0.002s ... 0.039s

#12 got single benchmarks 3945 +0.006s ... 0.045s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.045s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)