Intel Celeron 1019Y vs Intel Celeron 1000M

Intel Celeron 1019Y

► remove

The Intel Celeron 1019Y is an entry-level ULV processor for ultrabooks and tablets. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture, but with many core features disabled including Turbo Boost, Virtualization VT-d, HyperThreading, AES and Trusted Execution. Every core offers a clock speed of 1.0 GHz and, as with other dual-core Celeron CPUs, the 1019Y offers 2 MB of L3 Cache.

Ivy Bridge is an enhanced die shrink of the Sandy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm (versus 32nm Sandy Bridge CPUs) and are the first to introduce 3D transistors for increased energy efficiency when compared to similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processors. Other new features are integrated PCI Express 3.0 and  DDR3(L)-1600 support.

The performance of a Celeron 1019Y should be slightly above a similarly clocked Sandy Bridge processor due to slight architectural improvements. As a result, overall performance should be just a bit below that of the Pentium 957.

The integrated Intel HD Graphics offers 6 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 350 MHz up to 800 MHz with Turbo Boost.

The 1019Y is rated at a TDP of 10 W including the integrated graphics card and memory controller. Therefore, the CPU is best suited for tablets and ultrabooks.

Intel Celeron 1000M

► remove

The Intel Celeron 1000M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1000M is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1019YIntel Celeron 1000M
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E (compare)2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M (compare)2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M (compare)1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U (compare)1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1019Y1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE (compare)1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E (compare)2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M (compare)2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M (compare)1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1000M1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U (compare)1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U (compare)1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U (compare)1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE (compare)1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE (compare)1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
1000 MHz1800 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 35
22 22
105 °C105 °C
BGArPGA988B
Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
$153 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1019YIntel Celeron 1000M
94 mm2

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.7 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2480 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4757 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
6023 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
3151 Points (30%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1313.7 seconds (16%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
41.6 seconds (8%)
WinRAR - Result
1285 KB/s (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
8.5 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
47.2 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
1923 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.3 Seconds (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.1 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1076.4 Seconds (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22230 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13410 MFLOPS (10%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
4757 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
1779 points (9%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
13537 Points (9%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1214 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
1648 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
4938 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
4298 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
3016 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
2848 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
3405 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1000M → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)