Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Celeron 1020M

Intel Celeron 1007U

► remove from comparison Intel 1007U

The Intel Celeron 1007U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.5 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1007U should be similar fast as a Celeron B820.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1007U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1020M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1020M is an entry level dual core processor clocked at 2.1 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1020M should be similar fast as a Pentium B960. Like most Ivy Bridge dual cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 1020M
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1020M2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
1500 MHz2100 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 35
22 22
94 mm294 mm2
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1023rPGA988B
HD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 1020M

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 1007U +
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 1007U +
0.6 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 1007U +
4962 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 1007U +
2480 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 1007U +
1610 Points (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 1007U +
3440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1007U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)