Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook A1110

Notebook Specifications

Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens Lifebook A1110

Fujitsu LifeBook A1110 Review
Source: Notebookreview.com
The Fujitsu A1110 would be a great deal if it was $400 less than the current price of $999 for the configuration we reviewed. It offers a basic desktop replacement form-factor with a midrange processor and integrated graphics, which is the starting configuration for many budget notebook models. The design could be improved in many areas, but it does have a colorful lid which gives it a bit of a facelift. Build quality could be improved across the board with flexible plastic over the screen and palmrest. From what we have seen Fujitsu really needs to improve the design of this consumer notebook and rethink their pricing structure, especially now with the slumping economy.
Emissionen gut, Leistung gut, Verarbeitung schlecht, Preis schlecht, Mobilität schlecht
User Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2008
Rating: price: 40% performance: 80% mobility: 40% workmanship: 40% emissions: 80%

Fujitsu LifeBook A1110
Source: Computer Shopper
The LifeBook A1110 delivers solid performance at a reasonable price, and you can accessorize it with an assortment of colorful snap-on lid covers.
7.3 von 10, Leistung gut, Preis gut, Mobilität schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 40%

50% Fujitsu LifeBook A1110
Source: PC Mag
Competing in the budget laptop market is hard, what with the cut-throat competition from giants like Dell and HP and the countless low-priced models being offered. The A1110 would fare better against the competition had Fujitsu spent more time designing a sleeker-looking chassis.
2.5 von 5, Lesitung gut, Preis sehr gut, Display gut, Mobilität schlecht, Verarbeitung mangelhaft
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 40% workmanship: 50%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD: Onboard (shared Memory) GPU built in the GM45 chipset (Montevina). Because of two more shaders and a higher core clock, much faster than the old GMA X3100. Still not advisable for gamers (DirectX 10 games not playable or only with very low settings). The integrated video processor is able to help decode HD videos (AVC/VC-2/MPEG2) , e.g., for a fluent Blu-Ray playback with slow CPUs.

Lower end of Graphics Cards for users who want to play games. New games should run on these cards, but only with decreased details and mediocre resolution.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

T5800:
>> Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

15.4": 15 inch display-variants are the standard and are used for more than the half of all notebooks.  15.4 inch display with 16:10 are the standard for notebook displays.
The reason why so many people like displays with medium size is, that this size is not exhausting for the eyes, does not need too much current and the laptops can be kept quite compact.
>> To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.

2.9 kg: This weight is average for notebooks. Therefore the numerous mass of laptops with 15 inch display fits in this class of weight.

50%: This average evaluation is exceptionally bad. There exist hardly any laptops, which are rated so negative.

>> Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.