Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xi1546
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 12 reviews)
Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xi1546
Source: OurNotebookReviews
Archive.org versionThe Xi is also rather quiet and it best of all, it doesn’t squeak nearly as much as my old Inspiron used to. My overall impression is that the build quality seems to be very good. Like most things high tech it has it’s quirks and downsides but overall I’d say it’s a damn fine piece of technology.
kurzer subjektiver Erfahrungsbericht eines Benutzers; online abrufbar
Display hervorragend, Verarbeitung sehr gut
User Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2007
Rating: display: 95% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionFujitsu Siemens is a name generally associated with solid, reliable and somewhat unspectacular PCs. This release, we suspect, is going to do nothing to change the company's functional image. It may not be thrilling, but the Amilo Xi1546 is a decent laptop. A mid-range T2400 mobile processor from Intel provides the power. Teamed up with 1GB of DDR RAM, it helped the Fujitsu-Siemens to a respectable score of 95 in our WorldBench 5 test suite. The specification of the Amilo is very decent and it's well put together. This unremarkable laptop will get on quietly without a fuss, like all good PCs should, leaving you to concentrate on your work or entertainment. It's fairly priced, too.
minimal ausgestatteter Kurz-Test; online abrufbar
Preis/Leistung günstig
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/14/2006
Rating: price: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 93% price: 80% performance: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 95% performance: 75% features: 68% display: 80% mobility: 50% ergonomy: 91%
Source: Preissuchmaschine
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/21/2006
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Connect
DE→EN Archive.org versionUser Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 89% features: 89% ergonomy: 65%
Source: c't
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/05/2006
Rating: performance: 80% display: 85%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2006
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 85% performance: 82% features: 66% display: 73% mobility: 50% ergonomy: 91%
Source: SFT
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/28/2006
performance: 85%
Comment
ATI Mobility Radeon X1800: The ATI Mobility Radeon X1800 is a reduced version of the X1800XT with still a high current consumption.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
