Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pi 3540
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 8 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pi 3540
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionAs long as you're not looking for the most powerful laptop at this price, the FSC Amilo Pi 3540 is a great choice. It's stylish and usable, with a great screen and multimedia capabilities. Just make sure you weigh up how important performance and battery life are to you before you buy.
3.5 von 5, Display sehr gut, Ausstattung gut, Leistung mäßig, Mobilität schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/09/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 40%
Source: CNet
Archive.org versionThe Fujitsu Siemens Amilo Pi 3540 is a fairly average laptop with above-average looks. It doesn't excel in any particular area, but it is pretty affordable, so for that it earns our respect. However, if you're after a faster, lighter, longer-lasting -- albeit uglier -- Centrino 2 laptop, you'll be better off with the Samsung Q210.
7.5 von 10, Mobilität mäßig
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2008
Rating: Total score: 75% mobility: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Gamestar

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 60% performance: 50%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - 12/08

User Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 88% display: 84% mobility: 70% workmanship: 93% ergonomy: 82% emissions: 87%
Source: Chip.de - 12/08

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 76% features: 94% display: 81% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 68%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 1-2/09

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 12/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80%
Source: Gamestar
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/22/2008
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 60% performance: 45% display: 65%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2008
Rating: Total score: 48% price: 11% performance: 75% features: 57% mobility: 29% ergonomy: 50%
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS: Compared to the 9300M G, the GS has only 8 unified shaders but a higher clock rate. Therefore, the performance should be similar according to Nvidia. Supports
Hybrid-SLI (GeForceBoost and HybridPower) with Nvidia 9100M G and PureVideo HD (VP3).
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).
The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.
P8600:
Fast but still not overpriced dual core CPU. For most games and multimedia applications sufficient and due to the 25W TDP even for smaller notebooks useable.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.






