Notebookcheck

F1 2012 Benchmarked

Florian Glaser (translated by B Schulisch), 10/03/2012

Another round. Speed junkies will get their full fix when it comes to F1 2012. The modern racing game shines with the usual pretty appearance and high speeds, in addition to the official license package. Find out which notebook hardware has enough power to master the game in this review.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a loyal reader of notebookcheck? Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Especially wanted:
News Editor, Review Editor
(Smartphones) - Details here

F1 2012

The developer and publisher Codemasters can be described as an expert in the area of racing games without a shadow of a doubt. Along with the Formula 1 series, the series DiRT and GRID (formerly DTM) are also part of the portfolio from the British studio. The years of experience in the field certainly make themselves noticeable in the released games. Although F1 2012 may not strictly adhere to the criteria of a bona fide racing simulation, the game is nevertheless still significantly more demanding than other racing game counterparts (Need for Speed, Burnout etc.).

Technology

Technically F1 2012 is treading water somewhat. While the vehicle models and the advertising effects are quite impressive (especially the depiction of rain is stunning), latent shortcomings come to light beyond the track boundaries. One of these is the texture quality, which occasionally lags behind the current possibilities. Another is some polygons and other objects with low details. What is also a shame is that the track surroundings hardly provide any animations, making them seem a bit sterile. More track marshals or a few flocks of birds would not go amiss for example.

The navigation also allows room for improvement: Although the main menu is able to impress with a very good look, the complicated and intricate submenus tend to get a little annoying with time. Meanwhile, the adequate engine sound is unfortunately not able to gloss over this shortcoming either.

Ultra Preset (1.920 x 1.080, 4x MSAA)
Ultra Preset
High Preset (1.366 x 768, 2x MSAA)
High Preset
Medium Preset (1.366 x 768)
Medium Preset
Ultra Low Preset (1.024 x 768)
Ultra Low Preset

Benchmark

Since the free demo version doesn't have a benchmark included, we opted for the full version priced at about 40 Euros (~$51), which was kindly provided to us by Codemasters. As with F1 2011, the included benchmark is located at the lower end of the graphics menu. During the over two-minute long sequence the KI drives one lap against 23 rivals, which represents a practical scenario. After the benchmark is complete, F1 2012 gives readings for the minimum and average frame rates. The latter of these was then always entered into our database.

Ultra Preset (1.920 x 1.080, 4x MSAA)
Ultra Preset
High Preset (1.366 x 768, 2x MSAA)
High Preset
Medium Preset (1.366 x 768)
Medium Preset
Ultra Low Preset (1.024 x 768)
Ultra Low Preset

Settings

Praise is due to the developer for the comprehensive array of graphics settings. In the options menu there are almost 20 options available. Along with the resolution, the frame rate and the anti-aliasing (MSAA or EQAA), the vertical synchronization and the picture mode can also be set. Anti-aliasing is worth the while even if just for the menus (without AA a staircase effect is clearly visible).

Those that don't want to spend ages searching for the perfect configuration of settings will be happy about the five global presets (Ultra Low, Low, Medium, High & Ultra). Advanced gamers are also able to adjust the individual graphics effects manually. Irritating: Some settings are only effective after a full restart. Since the game doesn't provide a corresponding message, this could possibly be a mistake.

Ultra Preset (1.920 x 1.080, 4x MSAA)
Ultra Preset
High Preset (1.366 x 768, 2x MSAA)
High Preset
Medium Preset (1.366 x 768)
Medium Preset
Ultra Low Preset (1.024 x 768)
Ultra Low Preset

Unfortunately we had more bugs to deal with during the course of the test. The fact that F1 2012 sometimes crashed when shutting down (black screen) was another of the smaller problems. Significantly more problematic however, was the crashing on some devices while starting up - despite an up-to-date NVIDIA driver (ForceWare 306.23). Following a little Internet research, the culprit was quickly found: Deactivating the Steam Community (right-click on the game / >>Properties<<) solved the problem immediately.

Things weren't quite as smooth with the Radeon HD 7970M, which still had to operate with a slightly out of date driver until the arrival of Catalyst 12.9 (Clevo 8.951.6.0). Using the AMD graphics card F1 2012 initially didn't want to start at all (the exe file showed as a process and not as an open application in task manager). We can only assume that the aforementioned problems will be resolved with the next set of patches and driver version.

Ultra Preset (1.920 x 1.080, 4x MSAA)
Ultra Preset
High Preset (1.366 x 768, 2x MSAA)
High Preset
Medium Preset (1.366 x 768)
Medium Preset
Ultra Low Preset (1.024 x 768)
Ultra Low Preset

Results

For those that want to enjoy F1 2012 in its full glory, a graphics card from the high-end segment will be necessary. 1920x1080 pixels and the Ultra Preset (inc. 4x MSAA) are provided to a decent standard from a GeForce GTX 660M upwards. Mid-range notebooks don't have to relinquish good appearance either though. Thus a GeForce GT 630M or a Radeon HD 7670M already cope well with high details, 2x MSAA and a resolution of 1366x768 pixels. The graphics chip in the current Ivy Bridge generation (HD Graphics 4000) meanwhile only manages to process medium details to a decent standard. Owners of Intel's HD Graphics 3000 will have no choice but to come to terms with low settings.

As can be seen on the comparison pictures, F1 2012 compromises considerably in terms of the atmosphere when using the preset "Ultra Low". Along with the shadows, the illumination and the textures, primarily the reflections suffer. The audience and the drivers are completely obscured, and the rear view mirror only shows a gray surface. From the medium preset the graphics quality improves significantly. A score of "Good" is only attributable to the game at the highest level with anti-aliasing enabled.

Benchmark-Tabelle F1 2012

Verdict

Not considering the new racing mode, Codemasters hasn't been daring enough to embark on any extensive experiments with F1 2012. Gamers that are looking for a successful symbiosis between arcade and simulation should definitely take a closer look at the game. In our opinion the developer could have invested a bit more effort into the appearance though. Despite the above average quality, the EGO engine is already a bit dusty in the meantime. Those that have already purchased the predecessor won't necessarily have to get their hands on the latest version. Thanks to the moderate hardware requirements, even a mid-range notebook should prove to be sufficient for a decent performance.

Ultra Preset (1.920 x 1.080, 4x MSAA)
Ultra Preset
High Preset (1.366 x 768, 2x MSAA)
High Preset
Medium Preset (1.366 x 768)
Medium Preset
Ultra Low Preset (1.024 x 768)
Ultra Low Preset
Discussion

Test Systems

The majority of the devices used were from the company Schenker Notebooks (mysn.co.uk):

  • XMG P502 (Core i7-3610QM, GeForce GTX 660M, GTX 670M, GTX 675M, GTX 680M & Radeon HD 7970M, 8 GB RAM)
  • XMG A502 (Core i5-3360M, GeForce GT 650M & HD Graphics 4000, 8 GB RAM)
  • Xesia M501 (Core i7-2630QM, GeForce GT 630M & HD Graphics 3000, 8 GB RAM) 

The driver versions of the aforementioned notebooks: 306.23 (Nvidia), 8.951.6.0 (AMD) and 8.15.10.2761 (Intel).

From left to right: Schenker XMG A502, Xesia M501 & XMG P502
From left to right: Schenker XMG A502, Xesia M501 & XMG P502

Overview

Show Restrictions
Pos      Model                                     Perf. RatingF1 2012
 F1 2012 (2012)
low
1024x768
Ultra Low Preset
med.
1366x768
Medium Preset
high
1366x768
High Preset
2xMSAA
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
4xMSAA
 16NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M SLI
~84.875%
128
118
100
 21AMD Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
~66.650%
101
69
 22NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M SLI
93.9
173
141
134
109
 32NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
76.5
132
107
114
96
 33AMD Radeon HD 7970
68
120
106
95
81
 47NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
72.7
140
112
103
79
 49NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
91
184
136
125
1003
 51NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
~84.825%
97.5
 57AMD Radeon HD 8970M
66.3
144
101
91
65
 61NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
77.2
158
120
111
762
 62NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
84.2
158
127
116
99
 64AMD FirePro M6100
100
185
156
138
115
 68NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
68
124
102
98
79
 73NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
~83.650%
155
96
 75NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
84.8
1823
1363
1213
763
 82NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
~63.675%
104
97
62
 83NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
~58.475%
92
87
61
 93NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
77.7
1692
1333
1174
575
 101NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M
66.2
150
113
96
48
Pos      Model                                     F1 2012
lowmed.highultra
 103AMD Radeon HD 6990M
~51.325%
59
 109AMD Radeon HD 7770
59.2
116
103
95
45
 110NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
68.5
140
114
109
53
 117NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
~79.650%
161
83
 120NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
70.1
154
122
110.52
44.52
 122NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
~6875%
137
100
91
 124NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
68.1
155
120
105
41
 132NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
79.2
168
141
125
52
 134AMD FirePro M6000
71.5
167
122
101
51
 135AMD FirePro M5100
88.9
182
149
137
72
 136NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
75.9
172
132
114
50
 143NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
68.3
155
119
108
40
 150AMD Radeon HD 8790M
47
112
75
69
34
 158NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M
52.4
1282
873
773
333
 160NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
61.8
136
110
93
41
 167NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
48.1
110.352
87.752
632
35.652
 168NVIDIA Quadro K620M
56.9
111
96
90
47
 171NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
65.5
149
112
96
46
 178NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
53.5
1374
964
73.54
293
 184NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
60
142
103
85
41
Pos      Model                                     F1 2012
lowmed.highultra
 185NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
~46.125%
53
 187NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
~39.675%
77
60
30
 202NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
44.6
89
77
71
34
 204*NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
55.8
137
103
81
28
 206AMD Radeon HD 8750M
32.6
73
57
39
30
 213NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
41.8
783
70.63
69.53
343
 249AMD Radeon HD 8730M
~1875%
32
29
25
 251NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
34.1
74.52
662
51.52
192
 268AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
~23.675%
44
35
34
 270AMD Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
16.1
32
26
24
15
 271AMD Radeon HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
~22.275%
41
33
32
 272AMD Radeon HD 8670M
26.5
582
442
39.52
20.52
 274AMD Radeon HD 7660D
34.7
88.52
652
47.52
172
 292AMD Radeon HD 8650G
~27.975%
48
46
39
 294*AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
~1975%
35
29
27
 296AMD Radeon HD 7670M
34.4
86
67
47
16
 297NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M
35.6
833
683
493
213
 298AMD Radeon HD 7560D
30.1
82
51
43
14
 305NVIDIA GeForce 820M
34.1
79
60
51
21
 308NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
32.1
66
56
46
27
Pos      Model                                     F1 2012
lowmed.highultra
 316AMD Radeon HD 8450G + Radeon HD 8570M Dual Graphics
~8.250%
16
12
 319NVIDIA Quadro K610M
33.1
73
58
52
21
 321Intel Iris Graphics 5100
23
52
39
32
18
 334AMD Radeon HD 7660G
19.4
39
33
32
14
 350ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
25.6
63
46
38
13
 356NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
~24.375%
59
31
29
 360AMD Radeon HD 7610M
27.5
57
53
43
16
 370Intel HD Graphics 4400
19.3
47.54
32.54
25.54
143
 374AMD Radeon HD 7550M
~29.875%
72
45
30
 382AMD Radeon HD 7600G
~10.175%
21
15
13
 408AMD Radeon HD 7480D
18.9
45
32
28
12
 409Intel HD Graphics 4000
15.1
3215
2713
2113
123
 419AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
18.7
51
38
17
12
 423AMD Radeon HD 7500G
~725%
13
 426AMD Radeon HD 8450G
~10.975%
20
17
15
 427AMD Radeon HD 7470M
~6.525%
12
 432NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX
~21.575%
39
34
30
 433AMD Radeon HD 7520G
~10.775%
18
17
16
 443AMD Radeon HD 8330
~15.975%
29
25
22
 467AMD Radeon HD 7420G
~10.975%
19
18
15
Pos      Model                                     F1 2012
lowmed.highultra
 503AMD Radeon HD 8240
~7.150%
12
12
 511Intel HD Graphics 3000
13.5
362
212
14.52
12
 532Intel HD Graphics 2500
15.5
38.52
23.52
21.52
122
 533Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
11.6
22.52
192
162
12
 567*Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
~10.475%
24
15
12
 576AMD Radeon HD 7340
~6.525%
12
* Smaller values are better. / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
123Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article:
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > F1 2012 Benchmarked
Florian Glaser, 2012-10- 3 (Update: 2013-06- 6)