Asus U5F
Notebook Specifications
Notebook: Asus U5FProcessor: Intel Core Duo T2300
Graphics Adapter: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 128 MB
Display: 12.1 inch, 4:3, 1024x768 pixels
Weight: 1.4kg
Links: Asus homepage Asus notebook section
Average Score: 83.4% - good
Average of 5 scores (from 9 reviews)
mobility: 78%, workmanship: 83%, ergonomy: 86%, emissions: 71%
Reviews for the Asus U5F
Foreign Reviews
Sparsame Begleiter - U5F-2A122P
Source: HardwareLuxx 
online available, Very Short, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: ergonomy: 80%
85% Die Präsentation ist in fünf Minuten da!
Source: Facts 
, Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 90%
81% Subnotebooks - Asus U5F-2A028H
Source: Chip.de 
online available, Very Short, Date: 11/04/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 85% performance: 86% features: 82% display: 89% mobility: 74% ergonomy: 82%
Klein, aber flott
Source: Notebookjournal 
, Length Unknown, Date: 10/31/2006
Rating: performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Asus U5F
Source: Stiftung Warentest 
, Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: performance: 84% display: 86% ergonomy: 90%
79% Asus U5F2A028H
Source: Connect 
, Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 69% features: 81% ergonomy: 92%
81% Test Asus U5F
Source: Notebookcheck 
, Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 72% display: 86% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 85% emissions: 71%
Magerstufe
Source: Business & IT 
, Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
91% Notebooks mit Neidfaktor
Source: PC Praxis 
, Length Unknown, Date: 09/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 91%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
Only older games can be played fluently with these graphics chips (if they were not too demanding). Shared memory graphic cores in this category got the advantage of less heat production and longer battery runtimes. For office, internet, image processing, and video editing tasks these graphics chips are still useable without any restrictions.
>> Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300:
>> Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
12.1": This is the most common display format for subnotebooks and an average size for subnotebooks.
The advantage is, that the subnotebook can be small dimensioned and can be carried easily. Further the tiny display has the advantage, that it needs less power, which improves the battery runtime and in consequence the mobility. The disadvantage is that reading of texts is very exhausting vor the eyes. High resolutions can hardly be used.
>> To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
1.4 kg: This subnotebook is one of the most lightweight of all notebooks and can be carried very easily. There exist only few sub-notebooks, which weight less. 10 inch displays are normal for this class of weight.
Asus: Asus is an international manufacturer of medium size. In German and English speaking countries nowadays many notebooks of Asustec are reviewed. Nevertheless rather few laptop models achieve top-positions according total ranking and prize/value-rating.
83.4%: This rating is to be considered as average, because the amount of notebooks with better ratings is about equal like the amount with worse ratings.
>> Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.











