Acer Aspire 5553G-N934G64Mn
Specifications
Pricecompare
Average of 9 scores (from 9 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Aspire 5553G-N934G64Mn
Source: CNet Archive.org version
Oh, Acer, you don't half churn them out. The prolific spawner of laptops has just given birth to another addition to the Aspire range, the 15.6-inch 5553G. The configuration we're looking at, the 5553G-N934G32Mn, can be yours for around £700 from PC World and other vendors.
The Acer Aspire 5553G is a good all-rounder, offering impressive performance for a machine of its price. It looks pretty boring though.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2010
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
It might be cheap for a quad-core laptop, but the Acer Aspire 5553G doesn't deliver outstanding performance or value. It's a solid laptop, but the price needs to come down further before it's worth looking into.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2010
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 70% features: 60% mobility: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: T-Online DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/21/2010
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 75% performance: 75% features: 83% display: 72% mobility: 68% ergonomy: 96%
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2010
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 75% performance: 75% features: 73% display: 72% mobility: 68%
Source: PC Games Hardware - 9/10
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 80%
Source: Notebookinfo DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/17/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 50% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 70%
Source: PCM NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 10/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/11/2010
Rating: Total score: 60%
Comment
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650: Middle class DirectX 11 capable graphics card with a power consumption of about 15-20 Watt. Supports Eyevision (up to 6 monitors)
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
N930: Mobile Quad-Core CPU with 2 GHz clock speed. Because of the missing Level 3 Cache and no Turbo, the N930 is not well suited for games.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
15.60":
15-inch display variants are the standard and are used for more than half of all laptops.
The reason for the popularity of mid-sized displays is that this size is reasonably easy on the eyes, often allows high resolutions and thus offers rich details on the screen, yet does not consume too much power and the devices can still be reasonably compact - simply the standard compromise.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.2.7 kg:
With this weight, a laptop is rather heavier than average. Devices in this range shine more with screen size and performance than with mobility.
Acer: In 1976, the company was founded in Taiwan under the name Multitech and was renamed Acer or Acer Group in 1987. The product range includes, for example, laptops, tablets, smartphones, desktops, monitors, TVs and computer peripherals. Since 2007, the group has merged with Gateway Inc. and Packard Bell, which also market their own laptop product lines.
Acer computers are designed for a variety of purposes, including ultrabooks for mobile use, gaming laptops for gamers, affordable options for everyday tasks, and 2-in-1 convertible laptops for versatility. Acer's product portfolio also includes tablets that offer portable computing and multimedia capabilities.
73.11%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.