Notebookcheck Logo

SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB vs Netac S535N8/256GYN

SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB

► remove from comparison

The SanDisk X400 is a solid state drive with a capacity of 256 GB.

Netac S535N8/256GYN

 Netac S535N8/256GYN

The Netac S535N8/256GYN is an inexpensive SATA 3 SSD in the M.2 2280 form factor. We tested the SSD in the NucBox 3 where it showed a rather slow performance for a SATA drive.

SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GBNetac S535N8/256GYN
TypeSSDSSD
SizeM.2M.2
Capacity256 GB256 GB
InterfaceM.2SATA III
Announced03.04.2017 12.02.2022

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd - Netac S535N8/256GYN
4.2 pt (5%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -83%
...
2.46 -41%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
2.56 -38%
128 GB eMMC Flash
2.65 -36%
320 GB - 5400 rpm
3.15 -24%
Samsung SSD 470 Series MZ-5PA256/EU
3.44 -17%
SanDisk DA4064
3.59 -13%
3.62 -13%
Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC256D/EU
3.62 -13%
3.84 -7%
Netac S535N8/256GYN
4.15
4.35 5%
128 GB NVMe
4.39 6%
Samsung SSD 830 Series MZ-7PC0128D/EU
4.84 17%
Intel SSD 520 Series SSDSC2CW240A
4.91 18%
5.01 21%
Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series SSDSC2BF240A5L
5.16 24%
FORESEE 256GB
5.17 25%
OCZ Toshiba Trion 100 480GB
5.3 28%
5.38 30%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 2023%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Score Total
881 Points (5%)
490 Points (3%)
AS SSD - Score Write
220 Points (3%)
256 Points (4%)
AS SSD - Score Read
432 Points (7%)
151 Points (2%)
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0.1 ms (0%)
0.4 ms (1%)
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
0.3 ms (1%)
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
119.1 MB/s (2%)
163.7 MB/s (3%)
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
354.6 MB/s (7%)
100.4 MB/s (2%)
AS SSD - 4K Write
53.6 MB/s (10%)
49.7 MB/s (10%)
AS SSD - 4K Read
27.9 MB/s (9%)
11.8 MB/s (4%)
AS SSD - Sequential Write
473.3 MB/s (4%)
423.2 MB/s (4%)
AS SSD - Sequential Read
499.9 MB/s (4%)
391 MB/s (3%)
AS SSD - Copy Game
118 MB/s (2%)
AS SSD - Copy Program
89.4 MB/s (3%)
AS SSD - Copy ISO
424.1 MB/s (4%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
183 MB/s (17%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
344.4 MB/s (27%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
59.5 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
30.2 MB/s (1%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
323.2 MB/s (4%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
370.1 MB/s (8%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
477.4 MB/s (5%)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
470.8 MB/s (6%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
62.3 MB/s (6%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
16.9 MB/s (0%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
284.9 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
344.1 MB/s (4%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
111.2 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
102.8 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
289.5 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
497.6 MB/s (3%)
PCMark 8 - PCMark 8 Storage v2
4902 Points (96%)
HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum - HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum
258.6 MB/s (13%)
HD Tune Transfer Rate Average - HD Tune Transfer Rate Average
355.3 MB/s (15%)
HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum - HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum
367.1 MB/s (15%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
57.7 MB/s (13%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
7.5 MB/s (2%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
164 MB/s (3%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
88.1 MB/s (1%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
241 MB/s (2%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
201 MB/s (3%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
235 MB/s (2%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
484 MB/s (3%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
170 MB/s (1%)

Average Benchmarks SanDisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Netac S535N8/256GYN → 67% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 18. 18:53:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 982 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3788 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760806392s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:00:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 982 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 982 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3788 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 3788 +0.002s ... 0.012s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.124s ... 0.136s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.136s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > HDD/SSD Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)