Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia Tegra X1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G

Nvidia Tegra X1

► remove from comparison NVIDIA X1

The NVIDIA Tegra X1 (Tegra 6, Codename Erista) is a 64-Bit high performance ARM based SoC (System on a Chip) for (mainly Android based) tablets and embedded systems (like cars). It contains four ARM Cortex A57 and four ARM Cortex A53 cores in the processor part. As a graphics card, Nvidia integrated a Maxwell based GPU with 256 CUDA cores (see for more details and benchmarks). The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR3 and LPDDR4 with a maximum bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s (2x 32 Bit LPDDR4-3200). The Tegra X1 is the successor to the exactly one year earlier announced Tegra K1 SoC.

Similar to the Symsung Exynos 5433, the Tegra X1 uses a big.LITTLE combination of four power saving and small Cortex-A53 cores and four powerful Cortex-A57 cores. Nvidia however uses an own cluster migration solution instead of the ARM Global Task Scheduling (GTS) and therefore only one of the two quad-core clusters is active at a time.

The performance of the processor cores should be in the high-end segment of ARM based SoCs. Nvidia states that the X1 offers a twice as high energy efficiency compared to the Exynos 5433 (same ARM cores at 1.9 GHz manufactured in 20nm).

Due to the big Maxwell graphics card the SoC is mainly aimed at tablets with good cooling solutions and wont be commonly seen in smartphones. The Tegra X1 is produced at TSMC in 20nm.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888 4G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2021 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. Compared to the earlier released Snapdragon 888 5G, the 4G variant only features a 4G LTE modem.

The chip integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 

The performance of the processor cores should be around 15% better than the old Snapdragon 865+. The integrated Adreon 660 GPU should make a bigger jump by 35% (most likely compared to the SD 865).

ModelNvidia Tegra X1Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G
CodenameErista (Cortex-A57 + A53)Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
SeriesNVIDIA TegraQualcomm Snapdragon
Clock2000 MHz1800 - 2840 MHz
L1 Cache576 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology20 nm5 nm
Features4x Cortex-A57 + 4x Cortex-A53, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4-1600 (25.6 GB/s, max. 4 GB), Maxwell-GPU (256 Shader, OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenGL 4.5, DirectX 11.2, CUDA 6.0), Dual ISP (1.3 GP/s), H.264/H.265 4K60 Encoding/Decoding, HDMI 2.0, eMMC 5.1Adreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi,LPDDR5-6400 / LPDDR4X-4266 MHz Memory Controller (64 Bit)
iGPUNVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU ( - 1000 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 660
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G « 1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
L3 Cache3 MB
TDP5 Watt
Chip AI26 TOPS INT8
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 X1 +
min: 22527     avg: 23316     median: 23071 (19%)     max: 24349 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1751     avg: 3815     median: 4539 (43%)     max: 5156 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4222     avg: 4576     median: 4638 (53%)     max: 4867 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1099     avg: 1105     median: 1107 (37%)     max: 1109 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2944     avg: 3207     median: 3334 (6%)     max: 3342 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
X1 +
1510 Points (15%)
5083 Points (51%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
X1 +
4264 Points (4%)
13553 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 X1 +
min: 4208     avg: 4318     median: 4216 (7%)     max: 4530 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 X1 +
min: 1410     avg: 1460     median: 1411 (21%)     max: 1558 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
X1 +
min: 3844     avg: 4689     median: 4688.5 (5%)     max: 5533 ms
min: 1835     avg: 1887     median: 1886.5 (2%)     max: 1938 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 X1 +
min: 597     avg: 715     median: 715 (8%)     max: 833 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
X1 +
min: 7563     avg: 8032     median: 8031.5 (5%)     max: 8500 Points
min: 21748     avg: 23536     median: 22851 (15%)     max: 26010 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 101     avg: 108     median: 108 (19%)     max: 115 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 X1 +
2276 Points (61%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 X1 +
2535 Points (56%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 X1 +
6271 Points (83%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
20655 points (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 59811     avg: 63053     median: 63052.5 (64%)     max: 66294 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 90568     avg: 112682     median: 112682 (38%)     max: 134796 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 784775     avg: 789386     median: 789386 (38%)     max: 793997 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 205034     avg: 205504     median: 205504 (51%)     max: 205974 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 X1 +
2699 Iter./s (83%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 X1 +
15220 Iter./s (50%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 X1 +
129085 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 6858     avg: 7492     median: 7491.5 (37%)     max: 8125 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
35655 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11230     avg: 12134     median: 11897 (42%)     max: 13274 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
0 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.09     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (2%)     max: 5.84 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.357     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (1%)     max: 1.426 Watt

Average Benchmarks Nvidia Tegra X1 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G → 297% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 18. 23:48:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6612 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13837 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1766098121s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6612 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 6612 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13837 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 13837 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.015s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.016s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.02s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.028s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.028s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.028s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)