Notebookcheck Logo

Nvidia Tegra X1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850

Nvidia Tegra X1

► remove from comparison NVIDIA X1

The NVIDIA Tegra X1 (Tegra 6, Codename Erista) is a 64-Bit high performance ARM based SoC (System on a Chip) for (mainly Android based) tablets and embedded systems (like cars). It contains four ARM Cortex A57 and four ARM Cortex A53 cores in the processor part. As a graphics card, Nvidia integrated a Maxwell based GPU with 256 CUDA cores (see for more details and benchmarks). The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR3 and LPDDR4 with a maximum bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s (2x 32 Bit LPDDR4-3200). The Tegra X1 is the successor to the exactly one year earlier announced Tegra K1 SoC.

Similar to the Symsung Exynos 5433, the Tegra X1 uses a big.LITTLE combination of four power saving and small Cortex-A53 cores and four powerful Cortex-A57 cores. Nvidia however uses an own cluster migration solution instead of the ARM Global Task Scheduling (GTS) and therefore only one of the two quad-core clusters is active at a time.

The performance of the processor cores should be in the high-end segment of ARM based SoCs. Nvidia states that the X1 offers a twice as high energy efficiency compared to the Exynos 5433 (same ARM cores at 1.9 GHz manufactured in 20nm).

Due to the big Maxwell graphics card the SoC is mainly aimed at tablets with good cooling solutions and wont be commonly seen in smartphones. The Tegra X1 is produced at TSMC in 20nm.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 850

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 850

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 Mobile Compute Platform (or SD850) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It is a higher clocked version (3 versus 2.8 GHz) of the Snapdragon 845 for smartphones and also manufactured in 10 nm LPP FinFET at TSMC. It integrates 4x Kryo 385 cores (Cortex-A75) at up to 2.95 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 385 (at 1.8 GHz?) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X20 LTE modem (Cat. 18 1.2 Gbps downlink, Cat 13 150 Mbps uplink), ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.

The performance of the Snapdragon 850 in Windows is in theory similar to a Intel Core i5 of the Y-series (e.g. Core i5-7y54). However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled applications and games. 32-bit applications that are not compiled for the ARM architecture only run in an emulation and perform much worse (e.g. see Cinebench R11.5 benchmark). 64-bit Intel/AMD apps are not supported at all.

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at TSMC in the modern 10nm LPP process. Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 850 can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

ModelNvidia Tegra X1Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
SeriesNVIDIA TegraQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameErista (Cortex-A57 + A53)Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Clock2000 MHz2750 - 2960 MHz
L1 Cache576 KB768 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology20 nm10 nm
Features4x Cortex-A57 + 4x Cortex-A53, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4-1600 (25.6 GB/s, max. 4 GB), Maxwell-GPU (256 Shader, OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenGL 4.5, DirectX 11.2, CUDA 6.0), Dual ISP (1.3 GP/s), H.264/H.265 4K60 Encoding/Decoding, HDMI 2.0, eMMC 5.1X20 LTE Modem, Adreno 630 GPU
iGPUNVIDIA Tegra X1 Maxwell GPU ( - 1000 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 630
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 « 2.75 - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 compare2.8 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
L3 Cache2 MB
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SD 850 +
1166 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SD 850 +
2284 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SD 850 +
1456 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SD 850 +
37 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 SD 850 +
4745 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 SD 850 +
4.9 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 SD 850 +
28 fps (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SD 850 +
2.3 sec (51%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
34 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
75 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
1678 s (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
0 Points (0%)
13397 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
0 Points (0%)
12345 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
X1 +
min: 22527     avg: 23316     median: 23071 (19%)     max: 24349 Points
16059 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
1116 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
2132 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 850 +
488 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 850 +
1923 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
X1 +
1510 Points (15%)
2269 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
X1 +
4264 Points (5%)
7118 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 X1 +
min: 4208     avg: 4318     median: 4216 (7%)     max: 4530 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 X1 +
min: 1410     avg: 1460     median: 1411 (21%)     max: 1558 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
X1 +
min: 3844     avg: 4689     median: 4688.5 (5%)     max: 5533 ms
2836 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 X1 +
min: 597     avg: 715     median: 715 (8%)     max: 833 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
X1 +
min: 7563     avg: 8032     median: 8031.5 (7%)     max: 8500 Points
13947 Points (13%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 X1 +
2276 Points (61%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 X1 +
2535 Points (56%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 X1 +
6271 Points (83%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
20655 points (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 59811     avg: 63053     median: 63052.5 (64%)     max: 66294 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 90568     avg: 112682     median: 112682 (38%)     max: 134796 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 X1 +
2699 Iter./s (83%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 X1 +
15220 Iter./s (50%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 X1 +
129085 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 X1 +
min: 6858     avg: 7492     median: 7491.5 (37%)     max: 8125 Points

Average Benchmarks Nvidia Tegra X1 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 → 133% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 05:09:39

#0 checking url part for id 6612 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11391 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6612 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 6612 +0.012s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11391 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#9 got single benchmarks 11391 +0.012s ... 0.056s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.058s ... 0.115s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.133s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.076s ... 0.209s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.249s

#15 return log +0.04s ... 0.289s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)