Wiko Lenny Series

Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 5.70 inch
Weight: 0.17kg, 0.177kg, 0.199kg
Price: 120 euro
Average of 15 scores (from 16 reviews)
Wiko Lenny 3
It may be a budget smartphone, yet Wiko’s Lenny 3 still gives a bang for the buck. The 3rd generation in the Lenny series is improved in terms of its hardware and even comes in a wider array of colors i.e. space grey, brown, lime, cinnabar, gold and rose gold. For a budget phone, the Lenny 3 is a weighty device when compared to its rival, the RedMi from another Chinese manufacturer, Xiaomi. This is hardly surprising as it comes with a removable metal cover. Its dimensions measure at 145 x 73.1 x 9.9 mm. With metal rounded corners, it feels comfortable for holding. By removing the back cover, users will be able to access two SIM slots (a micro-SIM and a nano-SIM) as well as the microSD card slot (capable of up to 64 GB). Despite the lack of LTE support, it is capable of supporting 4 GSM and 3 UMTS frequencies. WiFi connectivity on this phone is decent albeit performance proves to be better on its competitors from Huawei. GPS coverage is also reliable and accurate. The Lenny 3 has an 8 MP, 1080p camera with autofocus and LED flash on the back, as well as a 5 MP front-facing snapper. Many would agree that the cameras on the Huawei’s Honor 5C would rank better; nevertheless the cameras on the Lenny 3 produce more superior picture quality than that of many other low end smartphones. Sound quality appears loud and clear from its speakers but lacks bass. Moreover, it features FM radio. The Lenny 3 has a special "WiCube" cover, which allows users to display data in cubes in a pyramid form. In addition, it is USB OTG supported. A standard 24-month warranty is offered on Wiko’s devices. The 5-inch display of the Lenny 3 with a resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels is quite good for a device in this price range. As its brightness appears to be on the lower side, outdoor use is highly limited. But, thank to the IPS technology, viewing angles are quite good. The device runs on Mediatek MT6580M SoC (System-on-Chip), which offers 4 cores at a clock speed of up to 1.3 GHz. Gaming performance stays on an average level but phones like this aren't made for gaming anyway. The same goes with its battery life, whereby in this aspect, RedMi will surpass it with its higher 4100 mAh capacity compared to the Lenny 3's 2000 mAh capacity. It is apparent that there is a notable improvement to the Lenny 3 and as mentioned above, it is a good entry-level smartphone considering its low price factor. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6580M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.177kg
Price: 120 euro
Links: Wiko homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The 3rd Generation. The Wiko Lenny 3 applies a fresh coat of paint to the budget smartphone series. Wiko hopes the improved screen and cameras will receive good customer reviews. We reviewed the smartphone and here are our findings.
Source: KL Gadget Guy

The Wiko Lenny 3 is all about having a metallic smartphone design rather than putting emphasis on features, therefore it is really difficult to recommend the phone to anyone due to its asking price tag and competition that the product faces. At the price of RM379, the Lenny 3’s features aren’t compelling enough to turn heads but as I said, look away from the flaws and just focus on its design, then you will be fine.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: KL Gadget Guy

The Wiko Lenny 3 is all about having a metallic smartphone design rather than putting emphasis on features, therefore it is really difficult to recommend the phone to anyone due to its asking price tag and competition that the product faces. At the price of RM379, the Lenny 3’s features aren’t compelling enough to turn heads but as I said, look away from the flaws and just focus on its design, then you will be fine.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 50% performance: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 66%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 66%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 05/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 5/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Wiko Lenny 3 Max
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6580M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.177kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 65% price: 70% performance: 60% display: 50% mobility: 85% workmanship: 50%
Wiko Lenny 4
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6580M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.00 inch, 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.17kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Good price; beautiful design. Negative: Average performance; unsupported 4G LTE; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/01/2017
Wiko Lenny 5
Specifications

Processor: Mediatek MT6580M
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-400 MP2
Display: 5.70 inch, 2:1, 1440 x 720 pixels
Weight: 0.199kg
Links: Wiko homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: PC Guia

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Nice display; decent dual speakers. Negative: Short battery life; no 4G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/07/2018
Comment
Wiko:
Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.
Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
ARM Mali-400 MP2: OpenGL ES 2.0 GPU for ARM based SoCs with 2 fragment processors and 1 vertex processor.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Mediatek:
MT6580M: Quad-core SoC (4x Cortex-A7 at 1.3 GHz) for tablets and smartphones.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00:
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
70.08%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.