, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

► remove from comparison Intel T4500

The Intel Pentium T4500 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4500 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4500.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4500 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4500 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4500 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

► remove from comparison Intel T4400

The Intel Pentium T4400 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4400) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4400 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4400.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4400 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4400 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4400 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Intel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
PenrynPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
» Intel Pentium Dual Core T45002.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T44002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T45002.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Pentium Dual Core T44002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
2300 MHz2200 MHz
800800
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 35
410 410
45 1.05-1.15V45 1.05-1.15V
107 mm2107 mm2
PGA478PGA478
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T4500 +
1.3 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2234     avg: 2315     median: 2331 (21%)     max: 2367
min: 2200     avg: 2231     median: 2231 (20%)     max: 2262
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4283     avg: 4366     median: 4337 (7%)     max: 4490
min: 4191     avg: 4227     median: 4200 (7%)     max: 4289
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 4458     avg: 4594     median: 4578 (4%)     max: 4747 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 2388     avg: 2447     median: 2416 (17%)     max: 2538 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1137     avg: 1142     median: 1137 (13%)     max: 1152.4 s
1203 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.7     avg: 35.9     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
38.2 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1887     avg: 1920     median: 1898 (10%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1850     avg: 1890     median: 1897 (10%)     max: 1915 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25     avg: 25.6     median: 25.6 (6%)     max: 26.2 s
min: 26.4     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (6%)     max: 26.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 62     avg: 62.9     median: 62.9 (3%)     max: 63.8 s
min: 61     avg: 61     median: 61 (3%)     max: 61.09 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1502 s (7%)
1489 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
21100 MIPS (10%)
min: 18500     avg: 19350     median: 19350 (9%)     max: 20200 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15460 MFLOPS (12%)
15800 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T4500 +
min: 3747     avg: 3865     median: 3865 (24%)     max: 3983 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T4500 +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T4400 +
3724 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 → 98% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 17. 19:05:03

#0 checking url part for id 593 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 565 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 593 +0s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 593 +0.016s ... 0.023s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 565 +0s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 565 +0.013s ... 0.037s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.045s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)