Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100

Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

► remove

The Intel Celeron SU2300 is a CULV processor for small and light laptops. It is the slowest dual core CPU based on the Penryn core and offers not all power saving features of the architecture. Furthermore, the Trusted Execution Technology feature are not available.

Due to the low clock rate, the performance of the SU 2300 Celeron is limited, but still noticeable better than Atom netbooks.

 

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100

► remove Intel T3100

The Intel Celeron T3100 or Celeron Dual-Core T3100 is an entry level dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the 45nm Penryn core but features only 1MB Level 2 cache and many functions of the core are disabled. Only the 64 Bit extensions and the Execute Disable Bit can be used. Hardware Virtualization functions, Intel Enhanced Speedstep and other power saving features are disabled leading to a higher power consumption than a similar Core 2 Duo / Pentium processor.

The performance of the T3100 is only suited for less demanding tasks like Office, Web, entry level image manipulation and SD video cutting. For demanding games, the T3100 delivers too less performance.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
Intel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
PenrynPenryn
: Celeron Dual-Core Penryn
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T31001900 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU23001200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 (compare)2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3300 (compare)2000 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron Dual-Core T31001900 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU23001200 MHz2 / 2
1200 MHz1900 MHz
800800
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 35
410 410
45 45 1.00-1.250V
107 mm2107 mm2
100 °C105 °C
BGA956BGA479, PGA478
Vt, Speedstep, Thermal Monitor 2Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
$134 U.S.
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3100
128 KB

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
0 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
0 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
0 Seconds (0%)
0 Seconds (0%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
0 Seconds (0%)
0 Seconds (0%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
0 MIPS (0%)
0 MIPS (0%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
0 MFLOPS (0%)
0 MFLOPS (0%)
-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)