Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos W1000

Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD W5 Gen 1

The Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 is a SoC for smartwatches and fitness trackers in the Wear series. It integrates a CPU with four ARM Cortex A53 cores and up to 1.7 GHz, an Adreno 702 GPU with up to 1GHz, a single channel (1x16) LPDDR4 2133 MHz memory controller, Bluetooth 5.3, WLAN 802.11n (2.4 and 5 GHz) and an LTE modem (Rel 13 with Cat1 bis support). The SoC (SW5100) is manufactured using a modern 4nm process. In contrast to the W5 Plus, the W5 does not integrate an additional Always-On-Chip (QCC5100 with a 250 MHz Cortex-M55 CPU).

Samsung Exynos W1000

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W1000

The Samsung Exynos W1000 is a comparatively fast processor (SoC) for use in smart wearables that was unveiled in July 2024. It features 5 CPU cores (1 Cortex-A78 performance core and 4 Cortex-A55 efficient cores running at ~1.6 GHz and ~1.5 GHz respectively) along with a 4G LTE modem, satellite navigation module, and the Mali-G68 MP2 iGPU. Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 4 and NFC are all supported as well.

Performance

Octane and Speedometer put it in the same ballpark as the Snapdragon 680 4G. It must be said that the Exynos W930 and W920 both had just 2 CPU cores, meaning the jump in performance that the newer chip brings to the table is quite frankly staggering.

Graphics

We expect the Mali-G68 MP2 to be exactly as fast as the G57 MP2 (assuming the G68 MP2 is half as fast as the G68 MP4, which it should be). As a GPU unveiled in 2020, this humble Mali series member does not have hardware ray tracing or any other modern skills.

While the W930 and the W920 came equipped with the very same GPU, it probably runs at somewhat higher clock speeds in the W1000.

Power consumption

As an SoC for smartwatches, the Exynos is unlikely to ever consume more than 2 W or 3 W (even briefly) because that would obliterate the device's battery life.

The Exynos series SoC is built with a 3 nm process for good, as of late 2024, power efficiency.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1Samsung Exynos W1000
CodenameARM Cortex-A53
Clock1700 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 45 / 5
1 x ARM Cortex-A78
4 x ARM Cortex-A55
Technology4 nm3 nm
Announced
TDP Turbo PL23 Watt
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2
ArchitectureARM
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 10155.7     avg: 10429     median: 10429.3 (12%)     max: 10703 ms
min: 2801.5     avg: 2870     median: 2870.3 (3%)     max: 2939.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 966.3     avg: 975     median: 974.9 (11%)     max: 983.4 ms
min: 481.8     avg: 486     median: 486 (5%)     max: 490.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4062     avg: 4072     median: 4072 (3%)     max: 4082 Points
min: 12676     avg: 12783     median: 12783 (9%)     max: 12890 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W1000 → 293% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 16:46:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15067 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18011 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1756046789s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15067 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 15067 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18011 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 18011 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.016s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.016s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)