Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675

Qualcomm SD 675

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (SD675) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 460 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2 GHz and  based on the ARM Cortex-A76 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.6 GHz and based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 612 GPU, a X12 LTE Modem with up to 600 Mbps download (Cat 12) and 150 Mbps upload (Cat 13), a 802.11ac (Wifi 5) Wave 2 WLAN modem (up to 867 Mbps), a Bluetooth 5.0 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (up to 4k30 encoding and support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Performance

Thanks to the two fast Cortex-A76 based cores, the SD675 is able to even best the old high end Snapdragon 835 SoC in some benchmarks. The less powerful Snapdragon 670 e.g. only achieves 70 to 77% of the performance in Geekbench 4.3 (single - multi core test). Current high-end SoCs like the Snapdragon 855 however can still add 50-70% on top of the performance of the 675.

The Snapdragon 675 is produced in the new 11nm LPP (Low Power Plus) process at Samsung which is a combination of 14nm and 10nm. Compared to 14nm LPP, the 11nm LPP process should be able to increase performance by 15% and decrease the chip size by 10% according to Samsung.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 678

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 (SD678) is a mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 460 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2.2 GHz and  based on the ARM Cortex-A76 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.7 GHz and based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together. Compared to the old Snapdragon 675, the clock speed of the cores was increased by 200 MHz for the A76 and 100 MHz for the A55 cores.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 612 GPU, a X12 LTE Modem with up to 600 Mbps download (Cat 12) and 150 Mbps upload (Cat 13), a 802.11ac (Wifi 5) Wave 2 WLAN modem (up to 867 Mbps), a Bluetooth 5.0 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (up to 4k30 encoding and support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Performance

Compared to the old Snapdragon 675, the 678 is only slightly faster in our benchmarks. Thanks to the two fast Cortex-A76 based cores, the SD678 is able to even best the old high end Snapdragon 835 SoC in some benchmarks.

The Snapdragon 678 is produced in the same 11nm LPP (Low Power Plus) process at Samsung as the 675 which is a combination of 14nm and 10nm. Compared to 14nm LPP, the 11nm LPP process should be able to increase performance by 15% and decrease the chip size by 10% according to Samsung.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 675Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6781.7 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6751.6 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6781.7 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6751.6 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Clock1600 - 2000 MHz1700 - 2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm11 nm
FeaturesAdreno 612 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Spectra 250L ISPAdreno 612 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Spectra 250L ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 612
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 675Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 678

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 678
31.6 pt (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15461     avg: 17199     median: 16912 (14%)     max: 19511 Points
19549 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1684     avg: 2448     median: 2548.5 (32%)     max: 3011 Points
3156 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1657     avg: 2433     median: 2546 (37%)     max: 2984 Points
2769 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2251 Points (18%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2956 Points (27%)
2812 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
11428 Points (22%)
12166 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5292 Points (11%)
5669 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6668 Points (17%)
7022 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 675 +
5667 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 675 +
1893 Points (39%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
5674 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 678 +
2219 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2376 Points (37%)
2570 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6554 Points (16%)
6381 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2266     avg: 2323     median: 2323 (27%)     max: 2380 Points
2483 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5998     avg: 6222     median: 6222 (8%)     max: 6446 Points
6570 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 492     avg: 501     median: 504 (26%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 939     avg: 1389     median: 1610 (5%)     max: 1618 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
486 Points (24%)
531 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
924 Points (3%)
1541 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2807     avg: 2849     median: 2848.5 (3%)     max: 2890 ms
2750 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15689     avg: 15703     median: 15702.5 (16%)     max: 15716 Points
15828 Points (16%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 70     avg: 76     median: 76 (21%)     max: 82 Points
71 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 675 +
130196 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 9191     avg: 10080     median: 10079.5 (31%)     max: 10968 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 42419     avg: 43904     median: 43904 (54%)     max: 45389 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 33571     avg: 33624     median: 33623.5 (10%)     max: 33676 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 75583     avg: 77634     median: 77634 (48%)     max: 79685 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 675 +
min: 159646     avg: 163741     median: 163741 (29%)     max: 167836 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 678 +
51338 Points (43%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 678 +
49402 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 678 +
31202 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 678 +
94453 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 678 +
226395 Points (22%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
190355 Points (25%)
2743 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3707     avg: 3748     median: 3748 (20%)     max: 3789 Points
3846 Points (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 6738     avg: 8585     median: 8585 (23%)     max: 10432 Points
10456 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7315     avg: 7660     median: 7688 (50%)     max: 7950 Points
7011 Points (46%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9288     avg: 9371     median: 9304 (47%)     max: 9522 Points
8220 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 678 +
11488 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 678 +
7645 Points (41%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 → 102% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 10:34:34

#0 checking url part for id 11403 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13220 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.012s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11403 +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 got single benchmarks 11403 +0.012s ... 0.025s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 13220 +0.005s ... 0.03s

#15 got single benchmarks 13220 +0.006s ... 0.037s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.042s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.056s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.056s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.061s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.063s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.065s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#105 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#107 return log +0.004s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)