Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 320M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon IGP 320M

The ATI Radeon IGP 320M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Mobile Athlon XP based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the IGP 320M with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is the Intel Pentium 4-M version of the chipset.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card with the Codename RS350. The chip supports DirectX 8.1 and is therefore not suited for Aero effects (Windows Vista upwards). Compared to the ATI Radeon 9000 IGP, the 9100 supports dual channel main memory.

ATI Radeon IGP 320MATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M compare @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M compare @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Pipelines0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed160 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 7DirectX 8.1
Features
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
Date of Announcement05.10.2002 23.06.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...
CodenameRS350
Shader Speed300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1537 Points (2%)
min: 1600     avg: 2680     median: 2680 (3%)     max: 3760 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 90     avg: 370     median: 370 (0%)     max: 650 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 320M → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP → 174% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 11:09:41

#0 checking url part for id 1911 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 May 2022 17:25:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.045s ... 0.046s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.047s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.047s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1911 +0.028s ... 0.075s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#14 got single benchmarks 1911 +0.004s ... 0.079s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0s ... 0.079s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#18 got single benchmarks 173 +0.004s ... 0.084s

#19 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.085s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.086s

#26 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.086s

#27 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.087s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.088s

#29 return log +0.002s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)