ATI Radeon HD 3200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400

ATI Radeon HD 3200

► remove ATI Radeon HD 3200

The AMD ATI Radeon (Mobility) HD 3200 is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip (on the RS780M chipset). It is based on the HD 2400 graphics core and features the UVD video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD).

Hybrid CrossfireX is a new feature of the chipset, that allowes to use the onboard HD 3200 graphics core in conjunction with a dedicated graphics card (of the Mobilty Radeon HD 3400 series) in Crossfire combination to increase the performance (similar to GeForceBoost / HybridSLI of Nvidia). Every frame is rendered by a different graphics core with this technique.

PowerXpress is used to save current if the HD 3200 is used with a dedicated graphics card of the HD 3000 series. The driver is able to dynamically switch between the onboard graphics (for low demanding tasks like office) and the dedicated graphics core for demanding tasks (e.g., games).

The UVD video engine is able to decode HD videos (MPEG-2, H.264, and VC-1) in all stages and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD on the HD 3200 supports the decoding of one video stream only. A second stream (e.g. on Blue Rays with PIP feature) has to be done by the CPU.

The graphics core of the HD 3200 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 2400 and is therefore DirectX 10 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 2400. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

Still older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should be barly playable. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA X3100), the HD 3200 is much faster. Even the Centrino 2 graphics core (GMA 4500M HD) is noticeable slower than the HD 3200.

Using Windows XP, the HD 3200 seems to have problems with current and older drivers, as there is no 2D accelleration. This leads to very slow interactions with windows and scrolling (especially with Firefox as reported in various discussion boards). More information on the topic can be found at Planet 3D Now (de) or the AMD forum

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400

► remove

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 IGP (or just Radeon HD 3400) is most probably a chipset graphics card for laptops. It is used in the Lenovo Edge laptops with AMD processor and should be slower than the HD 4225 IGP. Therefore, it can be based on the HD 3200 or HD 4225 chipset with different clock speeds. See both pages for more information on the graphics card and benchmarks.

ATI Radeon HD 3200ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
ManufacturerATIATI
Radeon HD 3000 Series
Radeon HD 3200 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Radeon HD 3100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon HD 3200 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Radeon HD 3100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
CodenameRS780M
ArchitectureRV6xxRV6xx
Cores40 - unified
Core500 MHz
Max. Memory512 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors181 Million
Technology55 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD, Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (adjust panel brightness automatically to save current), HDCP support, Display Cache (to save current when refreshing an idle screen)
Introduced04.06.2008 01.08.2010
Manufacturerhttp://www.amd.com/us-en/0,,3715_15337_1...

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 3200
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 3200
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 3041     avg: 6838     median: 6020 (6%)     max: 10182 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 1697     avg: 2611     median: 2429 (1%)     max: 3739 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 1475     avg: 2324     median: 2429 (4%)     max: 3190 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon HD 3200
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 3200
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon HD 3200
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + ATI Radeon HD 3200
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 4.6     avg: 4.8     median: 4.8 (60%)     max: 4.9 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3.1     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (41%)     max: 3.5 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.3 Points (49%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
3 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 3200
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 3200

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 3200 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Fifa 13

Fifa 13

2012
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
16 (!)  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
13  fps
Fifa 12

Fifa 12

2011
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
17 (!)  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
3  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
6.5  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
22.3  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
22.2  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
26.7  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
60.8  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
11.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
3.4  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
6.6  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
4  fps
The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

The Elder Scrolls IV - Oblivion

2006
high 1280x800
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
15  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
25 33.4 ~ 29 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
90 94 148 175 ~ 127 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
23 31 36 40 ~ 33 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
6 8 8 9 ~ 8 fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
58.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
18.3  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
5.8  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
65  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
43.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
42.4  fps
high 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
29.4  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
17.5  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 3200:
109.1 139.5 165 169.3 ~ 146 fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon HD 3200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)