Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 vs AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2700

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 is an eight-core desktop processor that can handle sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT). This technology is equivalent to Intel's Hyper-Threading. Launched in April 2018, the Ryzen 7 2700 is the second fastest Ryzen 7 processor and is much more economical than its flagship sibling. The Ryzen 7 2700 has a 65 W TDP, which is nearly 50% more efficient than the 105 W TDP Ryzen 7 2700 X. This energy efficiency comes at a cost to performance though.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has a base clock speed of 3.2 GHz, which can be boosted by Extended Frequency Range (XFR) up to 4.1 GHz. The power gain is still high in multi-threaded applications, although this is some way off the Ryzen 7 2700X. The Ryzen 7 2700 benefits from AMD's new Zen+ architecture, with a greater number of instructions per cycle (IPC) and higher clock speeds than last year's Zen chips. The Ryzen 7 2700's eight cores are divided into two clusters that are connected by Infinity Fabric, a subset of HyperTransport. Each cluster has its own L3 cache.

The Ryzen 7 2700 has good performance in games. However, if it is operating at a lower base clock because of low TDP, then the Ryzen 7 2700 falls behind the Ryzen 5 2600 in gaming benchmarks. This behaviour could be because many games currently lack multi-core support. Hence, games rely more on clock speed more than core count.

Detailed information, benchmarks and values can be found in our review of the Ryzen 7 2700.

AMD Athlon Silver 3050U

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 3050U

The AMD Athlon Silver 3050U is a mobile processor for thin and light entry level laptops. It is based on the Picasso series (e.g. Ryzen 3000U APUs) and offers two Zen cores clocked at 2.3 to 3.2 GHz without SMT (two threads at once) and 4 MB of L3 Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 2 and offers only 2 CUs (128 shaders) clocked at up to 1,100 MHz.

In Chromebooks, AMD calles the APU AMD Athlon Silver 3050C, but with the exact same specifications (and performance).

Performance

We have not tested a single system built around the 3050U, as of August 2023. Expect the chip to be just a few percentage points slower than the Athlon 3150U (two Zen cores, 4 threads, up to 3.3 GHz). This kind of performance should suffice for most day-to-day tasks but not much more than that.

Power consumption

This Athlon series chip has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop makers are free to change that to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and peformance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the APU is built with a 14 nm process leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2700AMD Athlon Silver 3050U
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
CodenameZen+Dali (Zen)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Dali (Zen)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X compare3.7 - 4.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 « 3.2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U « 2.3 - 3.2 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4100 MHz2300 - 3200 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 162 / 2
TDP65 Watt15 Watt
Transistors4940 Million4500 Million
Technology12 nm14 nm
Die Size213 mm2
SocketAM4 (1331)FP5
FeaturesSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
Architecturex86x86
$299 U.S.
Announced
L1 Cache192 KB
max. Temp.95 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 2 ( - 1100 MHz)
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1551 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
161 Points (48%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
16.7 Points (22%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4505 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
31385 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
49441 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 R7 2700 +
7756 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
130.5 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
5.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4440 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R7 2700 +
89.7 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R7 2700 +
195.7 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 R7 2700 +
9.5 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R7 2700 +
0.9 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R7 2700 +
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R7 2700 +
9 GB/s (23%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
308.3 Seconds (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R7 2700 +
9475 Points (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
11.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
597 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 R7 2700 +
51796 Points (45%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
13959 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
64158 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
64932 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
66419 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
12224 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 R7 2700 +
17915 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 R7 2700 +
8049 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1000 Points (42%)
743 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6560 Points (12%)
1429 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 2700 +
4681 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 2700 +
22776 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
140.9 Watt (24%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 2700 +
143.2 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R7 2700 +
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 2700 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon Silver 3050U → 48% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 11:45:43

#0 checking url part for id 10030 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11695 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.016s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10030 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#7 got single benchmarks 10030 +0.009s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11695 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 11695 +0.015s ... 0.045s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.119s ... 0.165s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.188s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)