Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 is a video card for notebooks. It is a for CAD and professional 3D applications optimized version of the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800. Technically equal or similar chip (NV41 architecture), but with another Bios and support for professional drivers.

With the added drivers the gaming performance is clearly worse than the Go 6800 (because of the application optimizing). However, modded drivers can be used, which transform the Quadro FX Go 1400 to a 6800 (for the operating system).

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000

► remove from comparison

The NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000 is a mobile workstation graphics card based on the old NVIDIA GeForce Go 5700. According to NVidia the FX Go 1000 was the first card to feature a 128-bit FP pipeline. Furthermore, 12Bit subpixel precision should prevent graphical errors.

The drivers of the Quadro FX seres were certified for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...).

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1000
Quadro FX Go Series
Quadro FX Go 1400 12/5 cores @ 0.33 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX Go 1000 4/0 cores128 Bit
Quadro FX Go 1400 12/5 cores @ 0.33 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX Go 1000 4/0 cores128 Bit
CodenameNV41M
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed330 MHz
Memory Speed500 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0+
technology130 nm130 nm
Features90nmNeue Funktionen und Vorteile der NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000:
  • Drei neue Vertex Engines und zwei neue Shader Units ermöglichen gegenüber der Quadro FX Go700 einen bis zu 50prozentigen Performance-Anstieg bei professionellen Anwendungen wie SolidWorks 2004, Unigraphics, Pro Engineer und Discreet 3ds max.
  • NVIDIAs PowerMizer™ 4.0 Technologie and das 0,13-Mikron-Design liefern hohe Performance bei gleichzeitig geringer Stromaufnahme.
  • High Definition (HD) fähiger und erweiterter Video-Prozessor ermöglicht Vollbild HD-Wiedergabe von DVDs.
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement25.02.2005 25.02.2004
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/page/quadrofx_go.h...http://www.nvidia.de/object/IO_11460.html

Benchmarks

3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 7000     avg: 7490     median: 7490 (4%)     max: 7980 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2300     avg: 2517     median: 2516.5 (4%)     max: 2733 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400
3DMark 06
1306 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 13:59:24

#0 checking url part for id 16 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 76 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 20 May 2022 17:25:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.041s ... 0.042s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#6 composed specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16 +0.027s ... 0.07s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#13 got single benchmarks 16 +0.004s ... 0.075s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 76 +0s ... 0.075s

#15 got single benchmarks 76 +0s ... 0.076s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.076s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.076s

#23 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.076s

#24 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.078s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.079s

#26 return log +0.002s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)