The AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 is a dual core processor for laptops based on a mixture of K8 and K10 architecture. The QL-65 integrates a dual-channel DDR2 memory controller and a single 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link (2000 MHz according to CPU-World). Compared to the faster Turion X2 models, the Athlon X2 features less power saving functions (no deep sleep, only 2 instead of 3 P-states).
The performance of the Athlon X2 QL-65 is similar to a 1.3 - 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo depending on the benchmark.
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-60 is a dual core processor for laptops based on a mixture of K8 and K10 architecture. The QL-60 integrates a dual-channel DDR2 memory controller and a single 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link (2000 MHz according to CPU-World). Compared to the faster Turion X2 models, the Athlon X2 features less power saving functions (no deep sleep, only 2 instead of 3 P-states).
The performance of the Athlon X2 QL-60 is similar to a 1.2 - 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo depending on the benchmark
The AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 is a dual core processor for laptops based on a mixture of K8 and K10 architecture. The QL-66 integrates a dual-channel DDR2 memory controller and a single 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link (2000 MHz according to CPU-World). Compared to the faster Turion X2 models, the Athlon X2 features less power saving functions (no deep sleep, only 2 instead of 3 P-states).
The performance of the Athlon X2 QL-66 is similar to a 1.4 - 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo depending on the benchmark.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 29. 18:07:35
#0 checking url part for id 520 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 435 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 556 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:39:51 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 520 +0.003s ... 0.012s
#8 got single benchmarks 520 +0.012s ... 0.024s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 435 +0.002s ... 0.026s
#10 got single benchmarks 435 +0.013s ... 0.039s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 556 +0.002s ... 0.041s
#12 got single benchmarks 556 +0.006s ... 0.048s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.074s ... 0.122s